My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-10-13 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-10-13 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:09:18 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:09:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minutes 10-13-99Page 12 of 31 <br />going to have to dig into the Charter, and probably rewrite the entire thing, because there are so many <br />little threads. And you see this when you read these old minutes down in the Archives. <br />I’ve come to you, as I said, about the Police Commission, but I want to talk about on Page 7 of the <br />County Charter, it seems like, the current executive, we continue to go behind trying to clean up things, <br />and there was a recent furor over him saying that he might decide to quit his job, or to resign, and run <br />again. Obviously, we’re going to have to change the Charter, and that would be in Section 5-1.2 <br />Qualifications, the last sentence where it says the Mayor may serve for more than two terms of office <br />but shall not serve for more than two consecutive full terms. If we just change the word "serve"; the <br />Mayor may be elected for more than two terms of office, but shall not be elected for more than two <br />consecutive terms. Change the word "serve" to "be elected". Give the voters the opportunity to do that <br />and, I assure you, they’ll probably do so, and that will solve that problem. I read back through the <br />Charter Commission minutes from ‘65 or ‘66 and they talked about this at some length, and their <br />concern about how the wording for this, and the way they put it, they didn’t want a machine building up <br />that the voters would not be able to have control over, and that’s kind of what we’re up against here. But <br />I would suggest putting that before the voters and I’m sure they would probably approve it. Thank you. <br />That’s all I had to say about that. <br />MARTIN: Before you go on any further, Mr. Chairman, may I speak to his last statement? If you were <br />to make the changes that you have just mentioned, it would still allow a person to resign and run for an <br />election. The terminology, itself - <br />PRANKE: They would have to resign and run each term. <br />MARTIN: Not necessarily. <br />PRANKE: I don’t think the voters are going to put up with that. <br />MARTIN: I understand, possibly not putting up with it, but changing of the words that you’ve just <br />mentioned would do nothing to hinder what you’re trying to stop. <br />PRANKE: Cannot be elected for more than two consecutive terms? <br />MARTIN: That’s the key, the consecutive terms. If you take that word out, possibly. <br />PRANKE: Yes, and that’s the case now, and that’s what it is now. The person can serve for two years, <br />sit out a term, and run again. <br />MARTIN: Correct. <br />PRANKE: Okay, that’s okay now. So what’s the problem? <br />MARTIN: There’s no problem but what I thought I heard you saying was the intent of our present <br />Mayor, if he were to resign, would he then be entitled to run again. <br />PRANKE: Yes. <br />MARTIN: And under the Charter, it’s yes. And even if you were to make the changes, and that’s what I <br />think I’m hearing you saying, to disallow that, the changes that you made mention to would still allow a <br />person to run again. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 10-13-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.