Laserfiche WebLink
minutes 10-13-99Page 13 of 31 <br />PRANKE: It cannot be elected for more than two consecutive full terms. <br />MARTIN: No. <br />PRANKE: Okay. <br />BALOG: But if you resign, you’re not serving a full term. <br />MARTIN: Thank you. <br />PRANKE: Yes, you’re probably right. Okay, I see what you’re saying. I didn’t think that through, but <br />there should make a small change in there. <br />MARTIN: Thank you, sir. <br />PRANKE: Probably should say ‘shall not be elected consecutively, more than two terms’. Something <br />needs to be done about that because, obviously, that’s a legal technicality. <br />SANTANGELO: Del, just real quick on this Managing Director and the election part of it. One of the <br />things I struggle with on the election part of it, is that in a Council Manager, County Manager, position, <br />what we’re finding is that the emotional part of an election. You know, a lot of times we are very <br />capable of electing people that are not qualified, and more and more, we have, in this day and age, a <br />need to really know what we’re doing on an administrative level, so with a Managing Director, it does <br />place more responsibility, and also that responsibility is encumbered by the public, to elect competent <br />County Council that would then hire this Managing Director, but the idea behind the Managing Director, <br />and I’d like to get just a comment on that, real short, that the idea behind a Managing Director is the <br />ability to have your best shot at a qualified, intelligent, experienced individual to manage that <br />administrative part, the Council still setting the policy. They’re still okaying the budget, but there’s that <br />administrative part of it. Now possibly in a scenario that might come up, the Council Chair may become <br />a non-voting member, except to break a tie, and become that Mayor that satisfies the State Charter and <br />other ceremonial functions, but there’s that whole thing of having ability to have consistently, at least do <br />your best shot, at a good person. Could you comment on that? <br />PRANKE: The only way that I could see that that would be appropriate in a democratic society is if the <br />people have a simple recall of that Managing Director. A simple recall. Not this junk they’re always <br />pulling where people go out and get petitions and then there’s always some technicality why the petition <br />doesn’t work. If enough people don’t want somebody in, they ought to have a simple way of recalling <br />that person, and if there’s not, then you divorce the people in a democratic society, from the person that <br />will be using their money and running their government. And don’t forget, all you got to do is read the <br />first Article of this. We are all the government. It’s not the people who are sitting up there at the County <br />Building. We are the government. <br />SANTANGELO: And I guess, just as a point of information, from the information that we’ve received <br />on counties that are peer oriented, that a huge preponderance of them operate under a managing type <br />situation, and have successfully for a long time. <br />PRANKE: I lived in a county that did that, and there was still the same kinds of political problems and it <br />didn’t solve anything. <br />SANTANGELO: Thank you. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 10-13-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />