My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-10-27 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-10-27 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:11:31 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:11:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minutes 10-27-99Page 24 of 48 <br />ratio. That’s all I had to say. <br />RAY: Do you have any comment on dealing with the complexity of EPA regulations in regard to <br />something like this? <br />TSUNODA: I leave that to my manager, operational people, to address that part. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />BOUCHER: May I make just one more comment? <br />RAY: Sure. <br />BOUCHER: I’m not going to be able to stay for the rest of your meeting, so I kind of wanted - There <br />was one issue I didn’t bring up in my memo, and it occurred to me while we were sitting here. We have <br />been negotiating with the Department of Health, as part of statewide effort to reduce duplication of <br />services between the State and the County, for the County to take over the management of the individual <br />wastewater systems program, that is managing all the cesspools, septic tanks, and private systems. Just <br />another issue for you to throw into the pot. That would be a substantial expansion of our current <br />responsibilities. It’s also another potential source of revenue, but that’s another piece of the puzzle that <br />should be considered as you discuss this. <br />RAY: Since you brought that up. I was at a State meeting last week, and I asked Mr. Tulang about that, <br />and he represented that there was a pretty wide divergence of - <br />BOUCHER: The dollars. <br />BOUCHER: The budgets to handle that. In other words, what the County would be reimbursed, or <br />however that would work, to take over that, and they were pretty far apart as far as the State vs. the <br />County, so do you have any sense of if that’s going to move forward, or how big of an impasse that is? <br />BOUCHER: The Mayor has expressed interest in it and certainly, the State has always traditionally been <br />very interested in it, and this is their best opportunity to date, to try and transfer that responsibility. I <br />think there would be a certain measure of efficiency gained by this. Probably the reason for the <br />difference in the cost, is we don’t necessarily feel like the State is operating the program properly. They <br />don’t inspect the systems. There’s not as much follow-up. So, if we were to take it over, we’re just kind <br />of insisting we want to do the job properly. As far as can we work it out, that’s really, kind of, up to the <br />Mayor in many respects, and I certainly wouldn’t presume to speak for him. But when both parties feel <br />that it’s in the general interest, you’d think there’s probably a middle ground. <br />RAY: Yes, this is a little bit off the point, but I just wanted to take advantage since you were here. Okay, <br />thanks. Let’s take a five minute break and then we’ll come back and deal with the Police and Corp <br />Counsel. <br />RECESSED The Chairman called a recess at 4:45 p.m. <br />RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 4:52 p.m. <br />RAY: Let’s reconvene our meeting. On the agenda for Unfinished Business, we have the Police <br />Department, Police Commission, and Corporation Counsel agendized to discuss some items that have <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 10-27-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.