My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-02-09 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
2000-02-09 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:51:35 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:51:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minutes 02-09-00Page 22 of 41 <br />the same kind of guidelines as the way I see the world, more from the private sector, and look at what’s a fair and realistic <br />salary level for these. But I can’t think of any reason why they shouldn’t, other than just politically, I’d rather it didn’t appear <br />on the list, just because it seems a little more controversial, but I don’t have any reason not to support it. Marni. <br />HERKES: Point of clarification. I’m not sure I understand your amendment. Was your amendment to include this complete <br />list? <br />YOSHIYAMA: Yes, correct. <br />HERKES: The complete list. Did the amendment include changing the Safety Coordinator’s designation to Director? <br />YOSHIYAMA: No. <br />HERKES: So, we haven’t done that. Okay. <br />BESS: And one other suggestion on that point. Basically, we’d be just changing the Safety Coordinator’s position, but we <br />could say ‘such other Directors and Coordinators as provided in the Charter’, and again, I’m proceeding from the assumption <br />that we’re going to do something about the physicians. But maybe that’s a false assumption. <br />HERKES: Well, we are. We’re including them in the motion. <br />BESS: Okay. I’m going to vote against. <br />HERKES: Because of the physicians? <br />BESS: Yes, and because of the whole list. I mean, I think there’s a way of handling this to make it more palatable to the - <br />SANTANGELO: They won’t put all that in here. If I understand right, Mr. Yuen, you said that this can be worded in which <br />we don’t have to list these with this long protracted thing. <br />YUEN: You have two ways to do this, the way the motions are stated. The way Gary’s motion is stated, you would have to <br />say, not exactly, but something like ‘Department Head, First Deputy and Physician and Band Director would be set by the <br />Salary Commission’. <br />IRVINE: And Safety Coordinator? <br />YUEN: No, I would word it in a way that the Safety Coordinator would be included as a Department Head, as long as the <br />Safety Coordinator was not moved into Civil Service. If the Safety Coordinator was moved, the Safety Coordinator, by any <br />stretch of the imagination, is not going to be a Department Head. Now, the way Marni’s motion was stated, the Charter <br />Amendment would just say, not exactly, but something like ‘Department Heads and First Deputies’, and it would include <br />everybody on the list except the physicians and the Band, and if the Safety Coordinator is moved to the Civil Service, then it <br />won’t include the Safety Coordinator. <br />SANTANGELO: One other question, if I could direct one at Michael. Mr. Ben, if the physicians aren’t on this list, there’s all <br />kinds of ways to handle that. You can go out for an RFP. There’s other ways to hire people, is there not? These are full time <br />people? <br />HERKES: No, but they’re County employees. <br />SANTANGELO: But they’re County employees. <br />BEN: They are County employees, yes. <br />SANTANGELO: But I’m saying, if they’re left out and there’s disgruntlement about that, there’s other ways to solve that <br />problem. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 02-09-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.