My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-07-12 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
2000-07-12 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:02:01 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:01:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission - Transcript of Meeting of July 12, 2000Page 17 of 45 <br />KUROZAWA: It’s another person, another title. <br />IRVINE: Add some more. <br />RAY: So the motion would be to keep the substance the same, include the Fire Chief, and put it in <br />bulleted form. Can I have a motion to that effect? <br />YOSHIYAMA: So moved. <br />RAY: Second? <br />HERKES: Second. <br />RAY: Any discussion? <br />HIGASHI: But the question itself is the same. <br />? It’s not the same. <br />YUEN: I think with – <br />HERKES: ‘Shall the following’ – Well, it is. ‘The following changes – <br />HIGASHI: The digest is bulleted form. <br />RAY: Wait, wait. Please hold on. <br />YUEN: I think this is our last meeting that we’re going to have before the deadline. I think that if you <br />pass this as a motion, I feel comfortable that the Commission has approved the basic form of the <br />question and I can redo it as you’ve suggested, and meet the problems without us actually having it a <br />hundred percent in hand right here. <br />SANTANGELO: Because it’s not really changing language. It’s just format. <br />RAY: Daryl. <br />KUROZAWA: Chris, when you look at this question, the way it’s written now, there’s really three <br />questions in it, or three basic concepts going on at once. And the question is whether you can actually <br />pool the first part, which is the research and development, parks and recreation minimum qualifications, <br />with the last part which is the – <br />MARTIN: Yes, exactly. <br />KUROZAWA: And put that as one question together and just sort of pool it as whether it be <br />strengthening their requirements for the position and then having the second part, which is really the <br />Chief Engineer title. It might become simpler. What will happen when they read this is they will see <br />three questions and if someone doesn’t like one of them, or disagrees with one, they’ll vote, obviously, <br />against everything else too. But it looks like the first two parts is really qualification issues and then one <br />is a title issue, so that might simplify it some. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 07-12-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.