Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />State legislature in '98 passed a law which applied to some kinds of permits, generally business <br />and development related permits, that would -, that the departments were supposed to set rules <br />that would give a maximum time frame for acting on the permit or they would be automatically <br />approved. That only applies to selected kinds of permits. <br />Some permits operate -, some permits already had a time frame in the law but it didn't say it was <br />automatically approved. Give you an example, getting a liquor license. There's a time frame -, <br />the Liquor Commission is supposed to act within so many days of your application or it <br />becomes Before '98 it didn't say automatic approved, it didn't say what happened, it just said <br />that they were supposed to act on it within, you know, 90 days or something. And now because <br />of the automatic approval, then that's what happens. If they don't act on it within so many days, <br />it becomes automatically approved. There isn't anything that applies to all kinds of actions that <br />says what happens if they don't -, if there's nothing taken within a set period of time. <br />WURDEMAN: The State law is pretty broad , but then it has some major exceptions such <br />as any program that's federally mandated or federally something else, and that's how SMPs were <br />determined by the Attorney General not to be -, to come under that law. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />WURDEMAN: And I was told the governor opposes that law, promised people he was <br />going to get it taken off the books, but I don't know. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />WURDEMAN: Nothing happened this legislature. Okay, this 13-18 on claims, it's been in <br />here a long time; it's unenforceable. The Supreme Court has ruled that we cannot require <br />someone to file a claim before they sue us, so it should be deleted. <br />Section 13-20, we have some inconsistencies between our open meetings requirements and those <br />of the State Sunshine Law. I think that we should just bring ours into compliance with the State <br />law and say so and let it go at that. <br />Thirteen -twenty-eight, the Salary Commission. The Salary Commission presently determines <br />the salaries of elected officials. The collective bargaining process determines the salaries of the <br />bulk of the employees. Excluded employees get to have their salaries determine -, or more or less <br />automatically raised pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, Unit 13. There's a few of <br />us, such as myself and my deputies, that are left out of this process, and we would like to see the <br />Salary Commission have jurisdiction over those of us who are not covered by any other process. <br />There's a couple other small matters, Urban Renewal, the State -, we ran into this problem. State <br />law presently requires the County Charter provide for the abolition and transfer of the power of <br />the Redevelopment Agencies. There's nothing in our Charter about it, and when the Council <br />21 <br />