MIN CHC 1999-08-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• BALOG: Okay. But you could always vary the time at the Special Meeting, right? RAY: Any more discussion or input on the idea that we go ahead, in the rules anyway, and it would read the second Wednesday of each month at 5:00 p.m. unless otherwise - John Santangelo. SANTANGELO: I think I'll pass. I think the last bit of conversation cleared - Just the one question is having one stated meeting a month vs. two, with the kind of schedule and the kind of work we have ahead of us, is it prudent to just have the one or would it be prudent to have two? HERKES: I think we will have two. SANTANGELO: But those will be Special Meetings. HERKES: We're just scheduling one. SANTANGELO: So those would be special and they're going to be special if we change the times anyway, right? • RAY: I think that's a good point but Chris brought up the noticing requirements. If we have two, we don't have to notice them. Do we have to notice the cancellation? How does that work? YUEN: I think we have to send to everybody that normally gets the agenda, a notice of a cancellation of a meeting. I would suggest that you go with one a month as a regular meeting and everything else be a Special Meeting because advertising for a Special Meeting is not that big a deal and the Commission has been doing that for all the meetings so far anyway. And rather than try to fit everything - I can tell by just listening to the discussion and people's scheduling that it may work out better to have one regular meeting and then to have Special Meetings where there's a bit of flexibility on the time and place. RAY: ALONZO: RAY: Okay, anymore input on the meetings? Yes, Mr. Alonzo. Mr. Chair, as far as the location site, it's going to be right here? It's available throughout the next year? I think it's safe that this is a good site to put. ALONZO: Can we lock in all second Wednesdays of each month from now until when this committee's dissolved?