My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:30:06 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
9/8/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-09-08 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
witnesses and so we have some good people testifying, giving us solid information. <br />Under Judge Ibarra's initial ruling, to have a separate body advise to us would be <br />somewhat of a redundancy, we think, and possibly a waste of time and monies, so this <br />proposal would make sense in that the Commission is having all the public hearings <br />anyway, and if we felt that we did not have any information, we could subpeona or bring <br />in different agencies such as the Office of State Planning and have their people come <br />in to testify to provide input on the CZM that maybe were not addressed during the <br />public hearing process. Virginia can elaborate a little more on that . This is a very fresh <br />issue that we're all trying to deal with right now. <br />RAY: Do you want to go through any more specifics in regard to these <br />recommendations? <br />IRVINE: No, I think that was the one. <br />RAY: I think he touched on adequately the terms and staggering, coming <br />up with some dates that are more practical, and I think that's basically it of substance. <br />Any more questions? All right, thank you very much, Leonard. <br />TANAKA: Thank you. <br />RAY: That concludes our Statements from the Public. We'll move to <br />Agenda item VII. Unfinished Business, and we're going to continue with the Planning <br />discussion. So if the Planning Director, Virginia Goldstein, could come forward, and I <br />don't know if you want to bring anybody else forward. <br />GOLDSTEIN: Good afternoon and thank you for allowing us the time to present <br />some of the issues that have come before us. I have with me Russell Kokubun who is <br />the Deputy Planning Director, and also staff Rodney Nakano and Alice Kawaha, who <br />may be able to provide different kinds of perspectives. Rodney Nakano is the staff with <br />the Board of Appeals. They have submitted separate testimony to you, and Alice is <br />also with our staff to the Planning Commission and so she has a different kind of <br />perspective, so there may be some questions that come from you that they might be <br />able to help with. <br />We have just handed out to you a Working Paper For Discussion and this paper brings <br />out at least three different issues, four different issues with splitting of the <br />East and West Hawaii Commission. One relates to the creating of a new Division of <br />Permitting within the Department of Public Works and I believe Jiro Sumada <br />provided you with some information earlier on the request to create a new division. <br />RAY: ; Yes, actually just verbally from Public Works and then, I believe, <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.