My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:30:06 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
9/8/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-09-08 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would be better if maybe it just be under one agency. <br />RAY: Roland. <br />HIGASHI: Ms. Goldstein, would you say 90% is technical information that <br />goes back and forth, and Planning's role is 10% administerial coordination? <br />GOLDSTEIN: 1 wouldn't say 90%, maybe 80%. <br />RAY: Kevin. <br />BALOG: I was just wondering if you stili have it available, but about three <br />years ago you supplied the Commission with a chart of 'if someone applies for this <br />permit, where they go, who they see and so forth', so actually I'm moving house and I <br />just found my book. 1 saved it. 1 thought it might be useful in my older years, but it <br />might be helpful, if you're going to do a follow-up to your proposals. It's in that book, on <br />any permit or anything you need to do with the County, pertaining to your proposal, to <br />submit it to the Charter Commission so they could understand the flow and the <br />workload, and where things do, and actually what your tasks may be. Like you're <br />saying, only 20%. If it's possible. <br />GOLDSTEIN: I think you mean the booklet on the Central Coordinating Agency? <br />It lists all of the permits that are required. <br />BALOG: We had another one that said 'if you come for a subdivision permit, <br />you go to this agency, this agency, this agency, and where to go. Then if you come for <br />zoning' - because I may understand what you're saying but there's other people with <br />questions. It would be easier to see it on the graph. <br />GOLDSTEIN: We can make it available. It's the Planning Commission <br />workbook, is what Alice tells me, so we can make that available. <br />RAY: Other questions on the Division of Permitting? So I guess we <br />can roll into number 2, the effect on the Board of Appeals. <br />GOLDSTEIN: If you go for this consolidation into Public Works, then I think we <br />need to look at where the Board of Appeals is housed. Right now, the Board of <br />Appeals serves both as an appeal body to the Chief Engineer, as well as the Planning <br />Director's decisions. But since all, or most, of the Planning Director's decisions are <br />going to go over to Public Works, it would seem to me that the Board of Appeals should <br />also then be moved out of the Planning Department and into the Public Works. Two <br />years ago, we also had proposed that the Board of Appeals, instead of either being <br />housed with the Planning Department and/or Public Works, that it be housed with the <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.