My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:30:06 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
9/8/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-09-08 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RAY: At some point, we certainly want to get them in the loop as far as - <br />GOLDSTEIN: I was hoping that they would be here today too. <br />RAY: Rodney, do you have anything to - <br />NAKANO: I did discuss this specific issue with the Chairman of the Board of <br />Appeals and I was instructed to inform the Charter Commission that the Board of <br />Appeals expresses some reservation and would desire some discussion with the <br />Administration in terms of this particular concept. Not having had an opportunity to <br />review this, at this point in time, they just want to express that they had some <br />reservations. <br />RAY: We'll make sure we afford them that opportunity. Any more <br />questions? Gary. <br />YOSHIYAMA: 1 have a question for Rodney. Are you speaking about this whole <br />thing or just about this Roman numeral 2 that Virginia was talking about, Board of <br />Appeals being administratively assigned to Public Works? Are we referring to one <br />stop shopping also, the concept, as you are conveying this message to us from the <br />Chair? <br />RAY: In regard to the Board of Appeals input, are you asking him as an <br />NAKANO: I think the Board of Appeals, in addition to being administratively <br />assigned to the Department of Public Works, perhaps has some reservations as to <br />their duties and responsibilities as it relates to the transfer of these authorities. Aside <br />from having this concept, exactly what is being transferred in terms of duties and <br />responsibilities, is not quite that clear. At the present time, according to the Charter, <br />the Board is the entity in which decisions that the Chief Engineer makes and decisions <br />that the Planning Director makes is heard. I think, under that broad umbrella, not <br />having some firmer idea as to what will be involved in the transfer, whether or not the <br />appeals process effecting decisions of the Planning Director, whether they have any <br />thoughts on that. <br />RAY: Roland, you, have a question? <br />HIGASHI: Getting back to that idea of having it tied to Corporation Counsel <br />you said didn't fly, what happened? Corp Counsel thought it was a bad idea or the <br />Mayor thought it was a bad idea? <br />GOLDSTEIN: They felt, in some respects, that their department would also be <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.