My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:30:06 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
9/8/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-09-08 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
we can go ahead and get that done. And then, the same thing with the Finance and <br />just see how far we can get. <br />IRVINE: I think there was one thing in Planning concerning Boards and <br />Commissions, actually all the Boards and Commissions. It's kind of a mess the way <br />people's terms expire and nobody gets appointed, and the Commissions can't function <br />and whatnot, and that, to me, would be something that we could get some wording on <br />for us to look at if we're going to make a motion. It could be stated quite clearly that a <br />member can continue to serve until his successor is appointed, and then just say, go <br />with Maui's language on 30 days. Does anybody have a better idea? <br />RAY: I like that idea. Go ahead, Kevin. <br />BALOG: The only problem I have is with 30 days because I understand that <br />all the Boards and Commissions, in general, for not the last couple of years, since <br />before even this Mayor's terms, have never quite been filled within 30 days. I'd like to <br />see 90 but I'd really settle for 60 because it's not this Mayor specifically. It's just <br />something in general that has happened over long periods of time, including this <br />Mayor's administration, and it don't happen in 30 days, okay, well, we're going to do <br />this and this. I still think, since you're saying the Mayor should have the chance to be <br />able to search, and I believe that there's not a lot of people that want to serve on <br />• Boards or Commissions just because they don't want to be part of government. They <br />want to talk about it but not do it. But I think the person nominating should be given <br />more than 30 days past an expired term. <br />IRVINE: <br />figured - <br />I have no problem with that except that Maui's says 30 and I <br />BALOG: No, I'm just saying, though, I was going to bring that up if we could <br />just make a motion on how much days, come to some kind of agreement, have Chris <br />draw up some language, and go from there so we can move on with that because it <br />deals in general with all Boards and Commissions. <br />RAY: Sure. <br />ALONZO: I feel the same way with Mr. Balog. First of all, the Mayor has to <br />submit a nominee, then it goes through the committees of the County Council, then <br />from there, it goes to the full Council, so it's going to take more than 30 days to act on <br />it. <br />HIGASHI: I just have a legal question and I'II pose it to Chris. Is there <br />anything that prohibits the Mayor from confirming somebody before another person's <br />term is over? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.