My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-09-29
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-09-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:26:04 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:19:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
9/29/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-09-29 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
don't have anybody. Let's say you can't find anybody. Let's say nobody steps forward. <br />What you're proposing sounds good but let's say there are nobody for that specific, or <br />particular, Commission. What do you do? You still stay with the 30 day holdover? <br />That was our concern and that's why we brought it up. <br />TANAKA: Hopefully the Administration Will be able to submit names to the <br />County Council, so it depends on whether - there's a couple of stages before you get <br />to confirmation. Number one is Administration nominating the names to County <br />Council, so that's step number one. So the time period there, and then the confirmation <br />time by the Council. So it depends on where the bottleneck is, I guess. But yes, <br />assuming that nobody steps forward, that the Mayor has no one to recommend, yes, <br />the 30 day would hold. We hope that that wouldn't happen if we started the recruiting <br />process early, and part of that, also, is because there's so much to learn, we would like <br />to see the new Commissioners come on in January, or February at the latest, so <br />everybody starts off from the beginning part of the year, instead of somebody coming in <br />in April and June, and they're having to catch up, come up to speed. As far as the <br />training, because nothing like this has been implemented yet, as soon as the person <br />comes on, whether it's January 1st or April lst, or whatever, that person starts their <br />training at that time, so you're in the meeting and that's your training. So having to <br />catch up with all of that. <br />MARTIN: More or less I agree with the concept except for the fact that <br />there's going to be certain Commissions where you're not going to find anybody to step <br />forward. Administration may not be able to find anybody, and I don't think the 30 days <br />is going to be enough as a holdover. I think we're going to need some leeway there. <br />RAY: Questions? Roland. <br />HIGASHI: I think the training concept is good but I don't think the Charter's <br />the place to put something like that. I think it's something administratively they could <br />handle. Maybe as a Commission, you could talk to the Planning Commissioner that <br />when we have new people, we should run 'through an indoctrination and training, but I <br />don't think it should be in the Charter. <br />RAY: Kevin. <br />BALOG: Two questions only. The first one, do you have knowledge if the <br />current Administration has ever stopped looking for people to serve on the various <br />Boards and Commissions? <br />RAY: Has ever stopped what? <br />BALOG: In other words, do you know - I mean we keep hearing that, oh the <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.