My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2000-01-15
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2000-01-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:12:40 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 8:14:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
1/15/2000
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANTANGELO: No, but we were still discussing a crossover and this is just there is <br />none. <br />RAY: Does anybody want to amend that with the one exception for the - <br />HIGASHI: <br />Amendment. <br />I want to defeat it and then start all over. It is more than this one <br />HERKES: I want it in writing. <br />RAY: Well, go ahead and discuss what - <br />HIGASHI: That's why I wanted him to come up with a draft that we can look at <br />something, and then amend that and move along. You know, with several scenarios. I <br />think he has the gist of what we're thinking about. <br />RAY: Well, maybe, could you do it in more of an informal note form? <br />HIGASHI: John, that's what he's been doing up to now and we've been taking <br />votes after that. <br />YUEN: I can draw up four or five options. I could draw up eight max. I can <br />• draw up eight max with a one time exception for six-year district Council members to <br />go to ten. I can draw up eight plus eight, for a total of sixteen. Any other alternatives? <br />Does nobody want eight plus eight? <br />IRVINE: Was anybody thinking eight plus eight? <br />YUEN: Nobody wants eight plus eight, so I'II forget that one. <br />HIGASHI: I'm not saying eight plus eight. It's a new office, eight consecutive <br />years, maybe. I mean, a person may be only in office for only two years now. A person <br />may be in office for two years and he could run at -large and be only eight consecutive <br />years. It's not eight plus eight. <br />YUEN: But I'm saying eight plus eight as a simplified way because those <br />are the main scenarios I've heard discussed so far, and I can imagine a few more, but <br />those - <br />HIGASHI: I think you've covered most of them. <br />MARTIN: There's always the two -four -two. <br />RAY: So, we have a motion on the floor. I guess we should vote on that. <br />HIGASHI: I say we withdraw this motion. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.