My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2000-03-08
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2000-03-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:35:56 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 8:33:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
3/8/2000
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IRVINE: Yes, you're right. It wasn't appointed in any manner. <br />RAY: I think how we got here is because originally we were focused <br />more on a Commission than a department. <br />HERKES: Yes, and we ended up with a department. Now I'm wondering if we <br />need the Commission. You're right. That's exactly how we got here. <br />IRVINE: Let's take it out to the public and then look at it again. <br />HIGASHI: The one other correction is the nine members representative of the <br />nine districts that we have, or do we have nine members in there? <br />YUEN: This goes back to the issue the Commission has not voted on yet, <br />of what to do with the other Commissions that have one member from each Council <br />district, if you go from nine to six. <br />RAY: I thought we had agreed that we were going to leave it the same <br />and you just come up with some language that would - <br />MARTIN: <br />earlier. <br />1 thought it was represented in the first passage that we read <br />RAY: That would basically figure out the way to leave it the same. It's <br />just way too controversial to change it. <br />HIGASHI: Maybe in a separate item in the Charter, where it refers to nine <br />Commissioners, we can spell out present nine districts, and I think you brought it up, <br />that if reapportionment comes around and it's not proportionate, the Reapportionment <br />Commission then will be engaged in re -appropriating the nine districts, something like <br />that. <br />RAY: No, my recollection is that we talked about some language that <br />would describe the nine Council districts as they presently exist, something like that, <br />because if this were to pass, there would no longer be the nine Council districts, and <br />just get around it that way. <br />YUEN: That's an option. We can say that if it passes and we don't have <br />nine Council districts anymore, that we will keep dividing up some of the Commissions <br />using the Council districts as they existed in the year 2000. That is an option, but I <br />didn't think that was voted on. <br />MARTIN: I don't think it was either. <br />YUEN: And so, if you want to vote on it, then we can do that. But I thought <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.