MIN CHC 2000-05-10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Constitution of this State. In this State of Hawaii, the Constitution reads right off the bat, it says the people, the State and its people will uphold the Hawaiian race. • happen to be that Hawaiian race. This Charter, which is only 36 pages long, makes no provisions for Native Hawaiians. We brought that language forward for you to consider that would incorporate Native Hawaiians into your Charter. Your Charter starts off in the Preamble and it says this: 'We the people of the County of Hawaii'; then you go to your definition in Article I, Section 1-1 gives the clear definition of who that people are. 'The people of the County of Hawaii shall be and continue as the body politic and incorporate by the name County of Hawaii hereinafter in this charter call County.' That's who the people of this County of Hawaii is. I hope you're not assuming that I'm part of that body political just because I happen to be here in the County of Hawaii. I was born and raised here. So I need for you, in the language we've proposed, because come from the land. I happened to be born and raised on the lands within this county. That's why we were here again. In the second section of that Article I, it talks about the geographical limits. The Island of Hawaii and all islands within the shores thereof and the waters adjacent thereto shall be the County of Hawaii.' Again, I come back to ask you, the confusion that this county has perpetrated to the Hawaiian people is that we once received an Opinion of your counsel here that says we're all included. This deals with Hawaiian home lands also. And if it does, put Hawaiian home lands in there then. Put it there. Don't say the whole island and then when we go to different departments within this county, we have no jurisdiction over Hawaiian home lands. That's the confusion part that's sending out the message to the Hawaiians out here that we are secondclass citizens, third, fourth class citizens. We're not included in your Charter. • That was the language. The language was to help include us and how we can get things done within this county. We sent a letter to the Mayor asking that we be included because about a month ago this question was asked of the Corporation Counsel by Curtis Tyler. Does the County have jurisdiction on Hawaiian home lands? The answer of Gerald Takasi was no. No. And that's the guy you're dealing with in your Council, in your Charter. You're going to make Corporation Counsel, include them — they're all in here. But the Corporation Counsel says clearly no. We have a decision from Mr. Wurdeman, an Opinion, in a totally unrelated matter, however, he does state this in his Opinion; the Hawaiian Homes Act did not authorize the State or local government to apply a tax lien to Hawaiian home lands. We take away the tax lien to the extent that the real property lien is an incumbrance on the property created by non- administrators of the Act, of the DHHL land. An Act of Congress would be required to attach it to Hawaiian home lands. The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act also embodies express provisions that the Governor — the Governor and the Board of Land and Natural Resources not exercise their powers and duties over lands having the status of Hawaiian home lands. That's in Section 206. This provision evidence a strong intent that Hawaiian home lands not be controlled by State or local governments, but by DHHL. The disposition of Hawaiian home lands by county tax here would be in contradiction of this intent. This is just one avenue. All I'm trying to lead you up to is that it needs to be included in your Charter. It needs to be included. Are we included or are we excluded? Because the Opinion of Mr. Wurdeman is clear, and your counsel agreed to it because he wrote something about it, that provides the incumbrance authorized to be placed on Hawaiian home lands by officers other than 13