My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2000-05-10
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2000-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:23:32 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 12:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
5/10/2000
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 2000-05-10 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
maybe we wouldn't have been in this position, when we first learned about this stuff <br />some years ago. And impeachment would have been a simple surgical slice, and then <br />we could have gone on. But instead, this thing lingers on and drags on and we're stuck <br />with this situation which is dragging us down. So I urge you to allow people to vote on <br />the opportunity to have each Commission member on an oversight committee <br />appointed by Council members — only the four oversight committees — and to allow for <br />all officers of the County, not just the elected officers, all officers to be impeached. And <br />I urge you to reject the idea of making the impeachment process more difficult. The <br />idea of an impeachment is to quickly get something to court because an impeachment <br />is like a quo warranto. It goes ahead of anything else on the docket as quickly as it can, <br />so that the judge makes a decision.. Now, the judge is still deciding by law whether <br />someone has committed an impeachable offense. It's not the 100 people signing. It's <br />only the judge making the decision. The purpose of the impeachment is to allow for a <br />quick resolution to something that might otherwise drag on, as we're seeing in this <br />case. <br />So those are the things that I would urge you, most urgently. And, of course, from my <br />friend, Mr. Pierson, — I don't think he showed up. He was going to. <br />RAY: He's here. <br />PRANKE: Oh. If he's signed up, I'm sure he'll talk to you about having 'telling <br />a lie' to be a violation of the Code of Ethics. Thank you very much. <br />• RAY: Okay, questions? <br />SANTANGELO: Del, you said you're opposing non-partisan? <br />PRANKE: I am. <br />SANTANGELO: In ten words or Tess, why? <br />• <br />PRANKE: Well, I'm going to let other people talk about it, but non-partisan <br />elections, I believe, don't allow for third and fourth party candidates the opportunity to <br />actually gain a foothold into the election process. But the other thing is how do we stop <br />the money coming from parties? How are you going to say the Democratic Party, or the <br />Republican Party, the Green Party, cannot solicit money for somebody that they want, if <br />that person avows himself as a Green, or such a thing? How do the citizens know that? <br />SANTANGELO: Well, Del, the thing I would counter with that that I struggle with <br />this, every darn time we've had somebody sit up here and talk about the Mayor, they <br />want to talk about a minority vote getter serving, and this solves that problem. And time <br />and time again, on Council races and the Mayoral races, we've said this guy, or this <br />girl, did not make it, and yet they have the seat. <br />PRANKE: We oftentimes elect a plurality President. You know. In the past, <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.