My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-16
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:10:38 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
6/16/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-06-16 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter review. We don't have any schedule on that right now. We'II just see how <br />things move along. When we do come up with agreed upon proposed amendments, <br />we'll have our legal staff work on the language to move those amendments forward and <br />the proposed amendments will be voted on by the public, at the latest in the fall <br />election of 2000 or if proposed, and we want to put it forward, we could entertain the <br />possibility of a special election prior to that. But in any case, everything will be voted on <br />to the general public. So that's where we are in the process. <br />Tonight, if you want to testify, please fill in a Registration Form that we have on the <br />desk up there. So far we have four people signed up to testify - five people and we will <br />go through you one by one so please come up to the table and identify yourself. <br />PUBLIC TESTIMONY <br />RAY: The first person to testify, Jesse Dawn. Jesse. Jesse, you can sit if you <br />want. There's no camera so make yourself comfortable. <br />DAWN: Okay. There was a letter by Mr. Ray in the paper and also a report in the <br />paper mentioning the possibility of the Commission entertaining the idea of doing away <br />with the Office of Mayor and personally, I think this is strangely timed and - <br />RAY: Can I interject one thing? Those reports were incorrect. The Charter <br />Commission has not discussed anything. in Commission yet. Individually, different <br />Charter Members have discussed with the press some things they are interested in <br />individually but the Charter Commission has not taken up, entertained, discussed any <br />of those to this point so I just want to make sure you understand that, okay? <br />DAWN: Okay, so it hasn't been - <br />RAY: So none of that's on the table. Those were all just possibilities. <br />DAWN: This would of course, involve a special election and I'm wondering <br />where the money would come from for that. I think it would be a very unpopular idea. <br />RAY: The context we discussed a special election in was the sort of "what if" <br />scenarios. What if we were to come up with changes to the Charter that we thought <br />might be substantive enough to warrant a special election. If that were to be the case, <br />when would you have to, what would be the triggers to hold the special election, when <br />would it have to be held, how would that affect the year 2000 election, so it was just <br />purely in that context. Kind of the "what ifs" to try to answer some of those questions <br />and we didn't get all those answers by any means. <br />DAWN: It seems like it would be, if the idea was entertained, would be just to <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.