My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-16
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:10:38 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
6/16/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-06-16 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• somehow railroad the 2000 election and be some pretty shady politics according to the <br />public. Anyway, that's the main thing I'm worried about is that happening. The other <br />ideas sound fairly innocuous but being that the present administration's time's up, the <br />eight year time limit for the Mayor and we're looking at new representation, just even to <br />entertain the idea of railroading that possibility with doing away with the Office of Mayor <br />so the same power group, you know, can appoint a new guy as part of the same power <br />group, the old power group - <br />RAY: Well, just to interject there - <br />DAWN: This wouldn't go over. <br />RAY: There again and my understanding is, the way that works is the County <br />Council would actually hire the Managing Director so it wouldn't be that old power <br />group, it would be the County Council would actually - <br />DAWN: Well, you have the existing power group deciding the outcome of the <br />2000 election. There's got to be some kind of illegality in that, sir. A flood of law suits. <br />Anyway, that's about it. That's all I want to know. <br />RAY: Okay, thank you. Del Pranke. <br />PRANKE: I'm sorry I didn't get these to you before but there are just four pages that <br />will help illuminate. What I want to talk about is a contradiction in the County Charter in <br />conjunction with the Hawaii Sunshine Law and the section of the County Charter that I <br />want to talk about is 13-20(b). I assume you all have a copy of the Charter so I didn't <br />copy that. I find that on page 30 of the - <br />RAY: Page 30? <br />PRANKE: Yes, it's titled Records and Meetings Open to the Public and it's Section <br />(b) and it says 'All meetings of the council, boards and commissions shall be held in the <br />council room, etc. Where personal matters affecting the privacy of an individual are to <br />be considered, the council, board or commission may, at the request of the individual <br />involved, consider such matters in closed session.' Now if you'll look at the handout I <br />gave you. Let me find my -. The first page under Section 92-4 of the Sunshine Law <br />says 'A board may hold an executive meeting closed to the public upon an affirmative <br />vote, taken at an open meeting, of two-thirds of the members present; provided the <br />affirmative vote, etc. A meeting closed to the public shall be limited to matters <br />exempted by section 92-5. The reason for holding such a meeting shall be publicly <br />announced and the vote of each member recorded.' When you go down here to the <br />Exceptions, you'll find no place does it allow for the person who is coming before the <br />board or commission to say I want to have an executive meeting and then they hold an <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.