My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-23
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 10:53:40 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:45:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
6/23/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-06-23 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
five -ninth's majority select a Council Manager or a City Manager, it seems to me <br />simple enough to have a super majority that's appropriate. I don't know if that's 6 or 7 <br />but I'm thinking more and more that our society, our American democracy, question <br />mark, really is a tyranny of the majority. We don't want to do things with a 51% <br />majority, we want to set up a system that forces us to spend enough time to come to a <br />consensus that we agree and then we work together and get something done. And <br />anything you can do as you're considering all these proposals that will work towards <br />that end, I think, is going to help the community and if it's well thought out and aimed at <br />forming consensus and problem solving instead of maintaining power control with the <br />barest of majority or minority, then maybe this bundle will be easier to pass. And I know <br />last time it seems like there were a couple loaded things that went through and <br />something wasn't supposed to get approved and it did and then something else, you <br />know. The community's awake now and I don't think there's a chance anymore to slip <br />anything in and I know there are pressures from different quarters to achieve different <br />objectives and I think it's time to make this a truly open citizen process for citizen <br />government. Thank you. <br />RAY: Any questions? Yes, Marni. <br />HERKES: Jeff, several of your comments were what we do. We will not be doing <br />anything but drafting up proposals. It will be an elected process. It will be voting. We <br />won't do anything. You will do it. You, the voters, will do it and so every time <br />somebody comes up and says what we do, we're just here to kind of collect testimony <br />and to come out with some kinds of consensus as to the kinds of things that we're <br />hearing and that's why we're asking a lot of questions is so that we can kind of delve <br />into what you're really thinking so that we can start to do that process. <br />TURNER: Right and I appreciate that and the time you're all putting in however, <br />you're going to write legislation that we get an up or down vote and we don't get to <br />modify it or amend it and that's what this process is for is - <br />HERKES: That's what you're doing tonight. <br />TURNER: Right. <br />RAY: Mr. Santangelo. <br />SANTANGELO: <br />Got a couple of things. I'm sure it was just a grammatical but you said <br />reach consensus in which we all agree and consensus isn't when you agree. <br />TURNER: Well yes, I was taking that to an illogical extreme. Reach some <br />substantial degree of consensus that will work. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.