My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-07-07
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-07-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:05:19 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:47:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
7/7/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-07-07 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BESS: I understand your comments with regard to trying to bring about more <br />diversity on the Commission but I'm talking about now your comments with regard to <br />supervision. <br />BOCHE: Okay. <br />BESS: And that's what's confusing me. <br />BOCHE: I'm not sure how it would work. <br />BESS: See, I think one of the things, and not to unfairly extrapolate on what you <br />said previously about how we should provide for maximum discussion or what have you <br />but I think when you look at this Charter, it comes from a very traditional viewpoint that <br />(a) we have an Executive Branch that is primarily responsible for administration and we <br />have this Council Branch that's supposed to be policy formulation and that there's <br />some how or other, a separation of the two and that by building in the administration <br />into one of those branches, that you have greater accountability. And what I'm hearing <br />you say is that, and it may relate to your feelings about better balance of power, that <br />the Council should have administrative functions as well as policy making functions. <br />BOCHE: Yes, I'm not sure. I'II have to think about it and I think that's one of the <br />things that maybe I'll take away from this meeting are your ideas for further <br />consideration of my own. I can go back and read this and think about it because, as I <br />say, I've got a couple of different ideas here about how the Boards and Commissions <br />should be appointed and I'm not really set in stone. I'm just exploring, really trying to <br />explore various ways to create a better County government. <br />BESS: Thank you. <br />BOCHE: That's all. <br />RAY: Just try to think practically how that would work from an administrative <br />standpoint, if you put the legislative body in that loop to make administrative decisions <br />on how these departments function and I think that's the point that Steve was bringing <br />up. How that would work. <br />Okay, any more questions. <br />MARTIN: Yes, I have a comment. Maybe I shouldn't be saying this but you made <br />mention of a group of people per se, being higher up in the rankings of a department. If <br />any one group participates or applies itself more than another and they do in fact, <br />proceed up the ladder, if you will, it's to their good luck I think and I just would be wary <br />of comment something like that. Yes? <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.