My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-07-07
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-07-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:05:19 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:47:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
7/7/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-07-07 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
appointing say the Planning Commissioners, and for what term. I don't see how that - <br />GRAHAM: You mean it seems inappropriate that a two year term would appoint <br />someone for a larger than a two year term? Well, we certainly have elected people in <br />Washington that are also appointing judges for life and all that kind of stuff so it doesn't <br />seem like it's unprecedented to do that. <br />MARTIN: I'd like to thank you for your comments and I appreciate your time coming <br />here this evening. I guess I'm going to ask you a question on what you now asked us <br />to possibly look at, in that the Mayor appoints the people. The Council now approves <br />or disapproves of them. So you're saying that they should have more power than just <br />approving or disapproving? <br />GRAHAM: Correct. <br />MARTIN: Okay. As I think our chairman has mentioned earlier, there has been <br />some literature and possibly some discussion. I see a letter now here from the general <br />public, in regards to a Managing Director type government. Well, how do you feel <br />about something like that? <br />GRAHAM: I don't really feel qualified. I haven't really researched that enough. I <br />know it's a very important issue. On your first point about approving, whether the <br />Council just approves or whether the Council nominates. Let me take an example like <br />the U.S. Supreme Court. Obviously, you know that the Court nominees get approved <br />by the Senate yet the President wields tremendous power in that. And we've seen <br />through different presidents the nature of the Court change because of that, so clearly <br />there's a big difference between just approving and nominating. <br />RAY: You want to go ahead and finish? <br />GRAHAM: Sure. Let's see, another just slightly different issue but I remember the <br />last time we went through the General Plan Review. The General Plan Review time, <br />this was Lyman last time around. For those who are concerned about long range <br />planning and development of the County, normally when a change is made requiring a <br />General Plan amendment, there is an environmental impact statement and process that <br />flows off of that that goes on. The only time that gets circumvented is if the Planning <br />Director puts through some changes to the General Plan which effectively could be a <br />spot aid to some particular project that he'd like to see happen for whatever reason and <br />I think that's sort of a flaw in the system that that can happen and I know that that was <br />an issue the last time around and I don't have the solution for you but I feel like you <br />should try to come up with some solution so we don't run into that problem again. <br />Another issue that I feel like the County really suffers with is politicalization of the Fire <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.