My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 2000-03-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 2000-03-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:06:59 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 8:36:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
3/11/2000
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RAY: We copied that from other Charters. The City and County was <br />looking at a major reorganization a few years ago and that was the language they used, <br />so just proactive - <br />IRVINE: I went out on the web a lot and talked to people in San Diego, <br />looked at the City of Portland, San Luis Obispo, some cities in Washington, and <br />whatever. And this is fairly standard language, however, the woman in San Diego said, <br />well, that's getting to be dated and she had even a farther out euphemism. So, <br />whatever it was, I can't remember what she said, I thought we weren't ready for that yet. <br />But that's the explanation for that and the fact that the City and County of Honolulu did <br />suggest having this sort of department a couple of years back. <br />RAY: But, if you've got something better. <br />GRAHAM: Waste Management. That seems like what you're talking about. <br />Your talking solid waste. <br />IRVINE: The other thing is that we really, really, really want to get the <br />feeling of let's recycle, let's take care of our land now. Mandating something like that <br />rather than leaving it where it has been in Public Works without some sort of statement <br />that this is what we want to see happen. <br />HIGASHI: Also, under the Charter, they're able to create a new department if <br />it's addressed in the Charter. This is going to be a growing concern from now on, and <br />maybe for the next 20 years. Our feeling is that we need to get higher expertise in this <br />field, and once we create a department, the Department Head would be somebody <br />differently educated than we have in Public Works now. And once we have it <br />established, other technologies come in, and other concerns can be addressed by this <br />department. So what we may have in here now may represent some of the things that <br />are ongoing, but there can be other concerns in the future and this department will <br />have to address that. <br />GRAHAM: Yes, I think I get you. That even though it's a bit narrow, as you <br />specified now, it may broaden in the future, so it might as well have a title that will <br />encompass that. Okay. Thank you. <br />Second, a sort of narrow, specific issue I thought of was when you're talking about <br />impeachment, and you're talking about a 3% of the voters in the County need to sign <br />for impeachment, it feels like that's appropriate for countywide elected positions, but for <br />elected positions within a district, all the impeachment petition votes should come from <br />the district served, I believe. So I think I would like to see you all make a change there. <br />HERKES: We had quite a discussion on that. <br />GRAHAM: In the same way, I mean we don't have impeachment at the <br />Federal level, or the State level, or something, but I don't feel I should be responsible <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.