MIN CHC PH 2000-04-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

everybody being, kind of, lumped in as a Department or Deputy Department Head, being paid exactly the same. And that doesn't make sense to us because in terms of the professional qualifications and the responsibilities of running some of these larger departments, seem to be much greater, and lesser in some cases, so it's logical that they're addressed differently in terms of professional standards and, in our mind, the pay rates tied to these. So, we will be coming out with some corrections there. Also, in the sections in the Charter, some of these job qualifications don't appear in the Charter Sections, and they're, kind of, lumped in in a section in the back of the Charter. We are going to try to clean that up, and have the Department Head qualifications dealt with in the Charter in the sections where they appear. Impeachment. There are two suggestions being proposed here. One is to do away with one of the grounds for impeachment, and that's the term `maladministration', which the feeling is that there is no clear legal definition for that. It's more suggesting a grounds for impeachment is you don't like the way somebody's doing their job vs. they're not breaking the law, like under malfeasance, that type of legal definition where they're required to do something by law and they're not doing it, which seems to be more of a grounds for impeachment vs. maladministration. So, that's trying to address that issue. Also, we're suggesting raising the threshold in terms of the number of signatures from 100 to some number. We initially suggested 3%. We'II probably lower that, and we also have to deal with a somewhat thorny issue of where the signatures come from in the single member districts, whether we would allow signatures island - wide to effect the impeachment in a single district, or whether we would restrict it and how that would effect the number of signatures required. Obviously, you wouldn't necessarily have the same level of signatures if you were restricting it to a district impeachment process vs. an island -wide. So, we'll come up with something that, hopefully, makes more sense in regard to that issue, and we've gotten some good testimony and suggestions in regard to that. By increasing the number of signatures from 100, which the court will handle, we've also had to come up with language which would request the verification of the signatures, and it pretty much follows the way it's done now with recall and referendum — just setting forth a procedure for how the signatures would be verified. So that will be part of the suggested language dealing with the signature verification. Number 13, Special Counsel. This is a request from the Corporation Counsel to do away with a potential dilemma where Corporation Counsel is required to hire special counsel, and right now the County Council has to approve that. They would still have to approve funds being appropriated for this, but it would remove a potential conflict if the Council decided they didn't want to approve it, and Corp Counsel felt like they had to appoint special counsel, they would be allowed to do that and would eliminate a potential conflict where the Council didn't want to go along with that. The Council would still have to approve the overall funding, the funding appropriation, for hiring special counsel; in other words, that category in the budget. In other words, the Corporation Counsel couldn't hire counsel, the effect being going beyond the appropriated amount 8