MIN CHC PH 2000-04-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

t Commission, that's sub -sections (e) and (f) that you're adding, my analysis as environmental (indiscernible) is that I think these are good and important things that you need to add. They make sense. I think a mistake was made by the last Charter Commission in removing one of these sections. RAY: That's a real mystery to us. You know, what happened was in the last Charter, language was voted on by the public and nobody seems to know just how it got in there. Our attorney, Chris Yuen, who is a real avid watchdog of these types of issues, the Planning Department, nobody seems to know just how that happened, so actually this language would correct something that was voted on in the last election. FRANKEL: Yes, I do think that is important to correct and I agree that you are going to be criticized because this is quite a complicated issue to explain to folks. But if you move forward on that, I can tell you that I will do my best to clarify the situation to some of the folks who are criticizing you on that. Couple of other minor points I just wanted to bring up. In terms of allowing the Planning Department to transfer some functions to the Public Works Department, in concept it may make sense in some circumstances, but realize, for example, in the Subdivision Code, there are a lot of issues that the Planning Department is supposed to consider before granting subdivision approval. One of them, which has taken 20 years for Hawaii County to implement, and finally was done about two or three years ago, even though they're required to by State Law two decades ago, is the consideration of trail access when doing subdivisions. If this function is transferred to Public Works, you're going to be transferring it to a department that has not, historically, shown any expertise or interest in taking care of trail access. Not that the Planning Department has done a particularly good job either. But at least there is the framework within which that can happen because of the qualifications for people that work for the Planning Department. And my concern is if that subdivision function is transferred entirely to the Public Works Department, you may lose the potential to protect trail access. RAY: This wouldn't move it. FRANKEL: Right. RAY: This would remove a barrier from moving it, so do you think that's a bad idea? FRANKEL: I don't know. I'm just pointing this out as a potential problem. Maybe that's something that would need to be discussed when the ordinance is done. Maybe it's a possibility that we don't want to even allow to occur. I think I'd be more strenuously opposed to this if the Planning Department had been doing its job for the past couple of decades. Because the Planning Department has been ineffective, 11