MIN CHC PH 2000-04-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I'II go on to the summary proposal number 2. You do not mention the possibility of increasing the County Council as a whole, but reducing it to 6 and having 3 at -large, which I totally oppose for reasons stated at the last public hearing. However, I do feel we should increase the number of Council members to 11, 13, or 15 member Council, which would be far more representative. The Council members would be better attached and in tune with their constituents. With only 9 members, the districts at -large and council members are not likely to be known by the majority of their constituents. In addition, it is far too easy to buy -off, pay-off, or influence just five members. It would be far easier for the average person to run and get elected. In other words, it would not take $30,000 or more to run a race. This would mean less influence by special interest donations. It would also reduce the Council members' workload to a more manageable level. And on to Elections should be partisan. There is good reason for this. Political parties are made up of people from the community regardless of what party they're from. They give the candidate an instant base and an initial place to go for moral and volunteer support. They are also a chance for people from the community to do a very close examination of a candidate prior to him or her going to the public. Remove this influence of the political parties and then you are left with only the influence of special interest. Thank you for hearing me out. Aloha. I'm a fourth generation kama'aina, born and raised on the Island of Lanai, Patty Barry. RAY: HERKES: Thank you. George Wallace. Wait. Can we have comments? Do you want to keep going? RAY: If it's anything new that we haven't covered before. I think that testimony's been brought up and I think you've commented. Are you going to comment in regard to more Council people? HERKES: Yes, I'm going to comment really on the timing and the dates for the Charter Review Commission. It seems to me having the Charter reviewed every ten years, on the year before the census puts us out of sync. And it seems to me that we ought to put some language in that maybe we go 12 years, and then have the Charter Review Commission on the years after the census, because what is being brought up is that, you know, in two years we're looking at a redoing of the Charter. So, I'd just like to put that on the table as maybe a possibility. We don't have to discuss it right now, but something just triggered me that we're all out of sync here, of this whole thing. RAY: Yes, let's bring that up. Okay, George. JIM OTTERSON: Can I say just a little bit? 26