Laserfiche WebLink
history of that section, why was it written that way, and that's all done at the request of the <br />Commission. So the Commission goes through it and decides what they want to take a closer <br />look at and then requests more information on that particular section, and that would show up <br />on a later agenda. <br />MS. KAWAUCHI: Mr. Chairperson, I'm still trying to figure out if Mr. Nahale -a is fully <br />satisfied. I'm wondering if the proposed schedule should reflect the Articles discussed and <br />then for the following meeting or the following month reflect something on the timetable to <br />show that it's an appropriate time to create the ad -hoc committee or to table the discussion <br />for further discussion of the Articles that were discussed before. I just want to make sure that <br />Mr. Nahale -a's concerns were addressed, and that if he wants communication from a <br />department head there's room for that. If we're going to discuss, for example, Articles I -IV <br />and we request communication from a department head about Articles I -IV, that there's room <br />on the next agenda to create an ad -hoc committee, or decide we want communication from <br />department heads. I don't know if I'm further confusing it, but I just want to make sure that <br />the concerns are addressed and the community and the public are properly noticed as to how <br />we are going to be taking up all of these agenda items. I think it might be a little bit vague or <br />not as comprehensive. Mr. Chair, I leave it up to you to invite any other comments. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: I think that if we do discuss something and Mr. Nahale -a has a <br />suggestion as to whether or not we need further follow up with Administration or someone <br />else, I think we can have a motion at that time. We can either have Mr. Hookano follow up <br />or if we want to create an ad -hoc committee, we have to put that on the next agenda and have <br />a motion to put that on the next agenda. I think Mr. Nahale -a, through our procedures that <br />we adopted today, could make a request to put that on the next agenda. So, I think it can be <br />handled that way. Mr. Hookano, is that correct? <br />MR. HOOKANO: Yes. I'm just wondering, Mr. Nahale -a, does that satisfy your question? <br />MR. NAHALE -A: Mr. Chair, what would help me is if we are going to have these <br />agendized discussions, I just want to have confidence that appropriate department heads or <br />other staff know that if they want something proposed, they should contact one of us <br />individually. I kind of had it in my head that during this item people would be coming up <br />and making suggestions. That's what I thought was going to happen. So, if that's not the <br />communication to the appropriate staff, and they want the Commissioners to propose <br />something, then I need to get some direct communication in order to do that. <br />MS. JARMAN: Mr. Chair, can we ask Mr. Ashida to come to the microphone? <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Sure. Good afternoon, Mr. Ashida. <br />MR. ASHIDA: Good afternoon. <br />MS. JARMAN: You may not know the answer to his question, but is the Administration <br />planning on having a representative here at each meeting and is the Administration looking <br />13 <br />