My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2009-06-05.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2010
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2009-06-05.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:47 AM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:21:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2009
Meeting date
6/5/2009
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 2009-06-05
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas
COMM. 008 Geographical Limits of the County
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 009 Hookano, L - Council Term Limits and other Counties
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 010 Definition of Qualified Elector in 3-3
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 011 Council Action and Brief of HELCO v. DLNR
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 015 Ben, M - Human Resources
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 016 Kawauchi, J - Forming Ad Hoc Committee
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHR. HAITSUKA: Do we have any other questions for these witnesses? Ms. Jarman. <br />MS. JARMAN: I noticed that throughout the Charter, most of the department heads have to <br />have something other than a minimum of five years experience in an administrative capacity. <br />They have to have to have some experience related to whatever that department is. But, we <br />don't have that for Parks and Recreation. Do you have any comments on that? You might <br />even appoint a lawyer, and what does a lawyer know about Parks and Recreation? I don't <br />know why that isn't there. There's that nice language under the Managing Director that has <br />five years experience, and then it says, "... and shall possess demonstrable education and or <br />professional experience as required of the office." This seems to indicate they need to have <br />done something in relationship to Parks and Recreation, if we added something like that. Do <br />you think that makes sense, or do you think we should add something like that? I know <br />Alapaki probably thinks, just leave it the way it is; it's fine; we don't care; or take it all out. <br />We have the Director and the Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation here. What do you <br />think? <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Mr. Fitzgerald, any comments? <br />MR. FITZGERALD: As far as Parks and Recreation, remember it's an appointed position by <br />the Mayor, and as far as the experience level - -I know this isn't referring to myself- -but, I <br />don't think the Mayor is going to appoint somebody to the Department of Parks and <br />Recreation Director that he doesn't feel would be qualified to be able to do the job in the first <br />place. Particular case, myself, I wasn't exactly in this field, but at the same time, I've been <br />doing it for many, many years. I think the way I read the Charter, and what it said before, it's <br />really under the discretion of the Mayor on who he is appointing. So, as far as a comment <br />one way or the other, I think experience would dictate what the Mayor would feel <br />comfortable appointing, as far as the job. Obviously, it's a big department, so managerial <br />skills would fit in. Remember, Parks and Recreation is very, very broad; it's cemeteries, it's <br />pools; it's culture; it's really about having experience in management skills as far as <br />regulating many employees, and many things to do with labor besides just programs. It's a <br />very, very broad department; probably the broadest in the system. I don't know if Clayton <br />has more to say about that. <br />MR. HONMA: I think Bob is absolutely right. When you get into the Department of Parks <br />and Recreation, people don't understand the broadness of the job. But I believe what Bob <br />said, the Mayor knows who he wants to appoint into these positions. As far as the language <br />in the Charter, I feel it is alright what it states in there. <br />MS. JARMAN: Thank you. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Are there any further questions for these witnesses? Thank you very <br />much. Mr. Nahale -a. <br />MR. NAHALE -A: Could you repeat? Was the proposal to eliminate Section 6 -3.4? <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.