Laserfiche WebLink
add the provision to modify those powers, duties and functions to also be, not just by <br />ordinance and not just solid waste, but also as directed by the Mayor. I think that's important <br />and very good. Along that same line, if you look up in the section 6 -10.2, I don't see that <br />section is proposed to be modified, and I think it is very limiting. Right now it says, "The <br />Department of Environmental Management is established to protect, preserve, and enhance <br />our environment by promoting the wise management of our waste." I will write all of this <br />up; but since these are on the agenda now, I want to just run through them. I would cross out <br />"...by promoting the wise management of our waste." You talk about the powers and duties <br />down in 6 -10.4, and I don't think you should really have where this policy statement of what <br />the purpose of this department is to be limited. I'm just going to give a specific practical <br />example. I've been trying to go through a number of different grants that are available, and I <br />was helping people do some for the Hawaiian Tourism Authority and also a lot of the Federal <br />grants, and it would nice on some of those environmental ones to have nice statement here on <br />what the department is, and if you put the wise management of our waste, that doesn't have <br />to do with something like self - sufficiency and environmental concerns. So I just think that <br />you ought to consider revising Section 6 -10 too. <br />One of the questions that keeps coming up is what about issues of sustainability, and whether <br />they would become also long term economic development. I know at one point Mayor Kenoi <br />in one of his submissions talked about if Research and Development should also be <br />considered Economic Development, or what do we do with Food and Energy Sustainability, <br />and I think Environmental Management said, "no," we really don't think that should be under <br />our department, or it's not under us, should it be under Research and Development. I just <br />think there is a lot of confusion, it's all getting shifted around, and I'm afraid it's going to get <br />lost. So again, here is an issue - -you are not meeting again for another 10 years - -where the <br />whole focus is on self - sufficiency and sustainability, and perhaps there is a way, despite the <br />economic circumstances, to establish a Department of Agriculture, Energy, and Economic <br />Sustainability. I think that you would, twenty -fold, get money if you did that, to promote <br />agriculture and economic self - sufficiency, including promotion of small scale community- <br />based farming initiatives, or to coordinate with governmental agencies to enhance agriculture <br />and energy, and economic sustainability; all of those things. When I read through the <br />minutes, and I read through the different responses, it's sort of being looked at and being <br />pushed elsewhere. If you just look up, whatever it is, grants.gov, these are the words that you <br />want to have in there. To the extent that you all can assist with that, I think that this goes <br />along with Mayor Kenoi's bit that we may need to hire additional people to move us forward, <br />just as Obama said that is critical. <br />Fourth is Communication 41, which is by Mike Johnson. He is addressing looking at the <br />Ethics Board, and just asking that you consider - -and I think that this will come up later, but <br />just to comment on it - -that there should be a separate entity for ethics violations. My <br />understanding is that right now enforcement is by referral to the Council and the Mayor. I'm <br />not sure what the right answer is, but his communication addresses the current problem, and I <br />think that there is certainly a feeling of what dealing with conflict of interest issues. To the <br />extent that you can address that, that would be great. I don't know whether this person is <br />here or not, so I just raise that concern since it is on your agenda, Communication 41. <br />3 <br />