MIN CHC 2009-10-09.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Here is probably the most important one that I want to mention. That is Communication 44, which Councilmember Brenda Ford submitted. That has to do with the Standing Committees of the Council, and basically ensuring that all nine members, all representatives from all districts will be able to be on those committees, and be able to submit legislation. Right now, I see this as critical to ensuring some trust from the public to the Council, and the whole structure of the County government right now. With all of the reorganization that is going on in the Council -- which, if you look at other Counties, where they have gone and have sort of majority heads of each of the key departments - -it is sort of a step by step process, to the point where - -and I think one other County in Hawaii does it - -a Councilmember cannot submit legislation unless it is approved by the person who is the head of that standing committee. So, you get sort of a lock control to even hearing certain bills. If you look at - -and I assume Brenda will be talking about it later -- basically, that Communication 44, the heart of it is to ensure there is proper notice getting out to the public, and two, that it ensures to the public and all of the different districts that they know that regardless of whether there is anyone anywhere on their side of the island or anyplace, who is head of a committee, that they cannot be prevented and barred from proposing legislation. The last one that I want to comment on is Communication 28, from Jay Kimura, I think it is under Old Business. He requests - -and it is a little bit vague in how it is written up-- basically he asks that the last sentence of one paragraph be deleted. My understanding of that last sentence that he is requesting to be deleted is that in case of an impeachment, such as for malfeasance or willful violation of the law, it says, basically that the County will defend any member of any board, except where it is for impeachment based on the finding of a willful violation or malfeasance. I don't feel that, if there is a finding, if someone is being impeached for a found willful violation that the taxpayers should be paying for that person's legal fees, or that should be representing them by the County Counsel. I think that is a conflict of interest, and I think it is wrong to do. So, those were other comments and communications that are being submitted, and I went through them, and I just thought I would take the opportunity to give my opinion on some of those that you are reviewing. Thank you for the opportunity. CHR. HAITSUKA: Are there any questions of Ms. Wille? MS. KAWAUCHI: Chair Haitsuka, I think she is not done. MS. WILLE: Excuse me, Karen asked me to bring up a Communication that was from Zion Estes on the possibility of live - streaming video casting your sessions. I believe she may have passed out a copy of that - -so I just bring that to your attention -- summarizing basically the two options. If you wanted meetings to be live- broadcast and also so then later they could go to your site and go on- demand, and watch the proceedings, then he sets out one price. Then if you want in addition, there is a high grade DVD that you would then have available. This is a great deal more work, I hadn't realized, but there is a second price for that. She has his email address, and if you are interested you can contact him. So, it would be just filming, and then anyone from all around the island would be able to watch. Or, if they are not available, they would just press, later in the day, on- demand, and they could watch the proceedings. Thank you very much. 12