MIN CHC 2010-03-12.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

legal problems, or it's not something they cannot do; but it seems to me the final language of the petition should go with the petitioner's committee rather than the county clerk. So, I wouldn't mind adding something that it would then be given to the corporation counsel to ensure that it's within the legal authority or it's somehow to amend the charter that way. CHR. HAITSUKA: I think the way it's written the committee has the last say as to what is included, and the clerk only can propose language; but that language is not binding upon the committee. The same would go for the corporation counsel. I guess we could, instead, put the corporation counsel on the back end maybe, as to review and approve as to form, or render some kind of opinion as to whether or not it complies with the law. MS. HECHT: Can I make a comment? CHR. HAITSUKA: In just a minute. KENNETH GOODENOW (At this time Ken Goodenow, County Clerk, came forward to address members of the Charter Commission.) MR. GOODENOW: Ken Goodenow, County Clerk. I appreciate what Ms. Jarman said. The point is to have the petitioner's committee, as I understand it, be the final say. But, I do note, that subsequently, in Section 15- 5(c)(2), it says, "For purposes of certification, any petition shall be found insufficient that: (2) Proposes an amendment or revision not subject to the powers of this article." The clerk determines the sufficiency, so even thought in the other section it says it is up to the petitioner's committee; here in this part it seems that it would be the clerk. So, I just wanted to point that out. Of course, we have no objection to corporation counsel, and not the clerk, determining anything when it comes to this chapter. Thank you. CHR. HAITSUKA: Ms. Hecht, you had a comment? MS. HECHT: Thank you, I did. The way the process works in 15 -4, is that the petitioners give the information to the clerk, the clerk has time to come back with any revisions or corrections, and it was assumed at that time, since the corporation counsel is representing employees of the county, that the clerk, if he or she had questions would go over and talk to corporation counsel and then come back to the petitioner's committee with any amended language. We had exactly that problem in the 2 %, and that's exactly why we wrote it like that; so the committee would have the last word, so it would go on the ballot as they liked, not as the county wrote it which was the case with the 2 %. So it is part of the process; we thought it was built in. CHR. HAITSUKA: Alright, thank you. I think the proposed suggestion would just make it clearer that the corporation counsel has the ability to give some input into the proposed language on the front end. We are going to get to the other section brought up by the county clerk afterwards, because it kind of relates to this. So the suggestion is to add in, "or corporation counsel" after the clerk in Section 15 -4(f). Do I have a motion? •a