Laserfiche WebLink
and seeing 19 things, and as I read through them seeing some that are very similar. <br />However, I am also swayed by what Ms. Jarman is saying. And as long as I can be <br />assured that we will have some say in organizing the order, and having some say in how <br />it appears, I would be willing to - -in fact I will -- withdraw my motion to do that additional <br />consolidation. <br />Mr. Shumway withdrew his motion to consolidate <br />CA -36, CA -3 and CA -4. <br />MS. JARMAN: Perhaps we could take a brief recess and go check with Pat Nakamoto, <br />who is right across the hallway. She is the head of the elections office and we can make <br />sure that my memory of how ballot questions are arranged, and that we can actually put <br />them in the order that we want to. I don't think it has to be the order in which we passed <br />them; but I think it would make me feel comfortable, since I'm the one that nodded my <br />head "yes" to just confirm it with her. <br />RECESS: At 2:25 p.m., the Chair called for a 10 minute recess. <br />RECONVENE: The meeting was reconvened at 2:35 p.m. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: We are back in session. Ms. Jarman, did you follow up with the <br />County Clerk's Election Officer? <br />MS. JARMAN: I tried, but unfortunately, they are all over in Honolulu helping with the <br />Special Election, and nobody is answering their cell phone. But, there certainly is <br />nothing in the Charter that would demand that we do it, and I know there is nothing in the <br />election law that says we have to do it in the order in which we passed them. I would say <br />that I am pretty comfortable with the fact that we can put them in the order that we would <br />like to; that we think would make the most sense for the electorate. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Thank you. So, the last motion was withdrawn by Mr. Shumway, <br />and I forgot what motion we were on now. I think Mr. Nahale -a wanted to make a <br />motion to reconsider the last motion. <br />MR. HOOKANO: For a reconsideration vote, the second does not have to be a member <br />who voted on the prevailing side, only the maker of the motion has to be on the <br />prevailing side. <br />Mr. Nahale -a moved to reconsider the vote on <br />the motion to consolidate CA -23 and CA -9. <br />Seconded by Ms. Jarman. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Just for clarification purposes, the motion is to reconsider the vote <br />on the motion to combine CA -23 and CA -9 for balloting purposes. <br />16 <br />