MIN CHC 2009-09-19 PH-Waimea.tif

Home

But who is giving advice? What happens right now is that Ashida, who is part of Mayor Kenoi's cabinet, and clearly identifies with the executive branch, and if there is any conflict, he stands by the executive branch. I think what happens is then you don't have those issues, those disagreements worked out at that level where they should be. Instead, things end up going to court, that shouldn't go to court; such as with the impact fees, where Judge Ibarra said, is your impact fee ordinance in line with the State statute. Well, it clearly is not, and what Chris Yuen said is well, if it gets to litigation, then we'll deal with it. Corporation Counsel's office basically said, we are going with the executive branch, which was in litigation over that point. Tome, it just set the County up for risk. I don't want to spend a lot of time on this, but there were a number of cases that if you had more discussion on the county level, we wouldn't have ended up in court in the Hokulia case, in the Leslie case. As I see it, you would have had those discussions on this level, rather than sort of all the people that are being sort of yes - people to whatever the administration's position is. I encourage you to look at how to have some separation. I did write something up on that. Certainly right now, there is a great deal of distrust with the corporation counsel, and the whole county legal system because of what's going on with the county council. As I went through, a lot of what you all wrote in the minutes, if it weren't for all of that going on, I would agree with more, such as the four year term limits. But, right now Clerk Goodenow and Ashida are right in the middle of what's going on. Yoshimoto, Ashida and Goodenow are like three of them right together. Then you have the council majority, and the minority is just being left out. But, I'm not looking at it from the position of those council people; I'm looking at it from the position of the public. When we sit there and watch this going on and see -- televised -- Goodenow is saying one thing here, but then he said another thing the day before, and Ashida is saying this, and it's all --- Anyways, I think it's important to be aware that right now, there is more distrust, and so where a conflict of interest may not in the past have seemed so important, it certainly is important right now. On the Legislative Research assistants; they are all appointed positions, and again, this makes everything so political. It seemed like you were leaning in the direction of making those positions not appointed, but whether it's civil service, or whatever you call it. So that they- - number one - -are not just looking at themselves as political beings that have to--- Basically the way it goes, is they have to do whatever Goodenow says, and Goodenow says whatever Ashida and Yoshimoto say. So, even if they come up and write something- -here is the analysis - -they can't give it to the councilperson if it disagrees with the position of someone who is right in the Mayor's cabinet. And, let me just say, I like our Mayor, this is nothing personal, I'm just trying to look at it as a matter of trust and accountability to the public. If you do any transitions, I think it's important to say how you are dealing with people who are in positions right now, whether that has to do with changing the number of years for council, or a board members, or council members versus how you deal with the legislative research branch. If you are aware, there was a lawsuit about Arakaki, and he transitioned from four year terms to two years terms. Everyone protested, you don't get another two year term. They went to court about it, but by the time they got a decision saying he couldn't do that, he had already served out those additional two years. Staggered terms, I think there was a general sense that didn't work, and I agreed with that. I hope you don't mind if I just sort 12