MIN CHC 2009-09-19 PH-Waimea.tif

Home

of go through these points and give you feedback on all of it. I'll run down them as fast as I can. Having nine members at- large, I think it would just be so easy to get weighted to the more urban areas. At least now, we have moved to where it's by district, and probably that works out the best. Under Legislative Research Branch there are also points about posting electronic notice. I noticed that on your list you had on number nine, about special meetings, and putting those on to the web site. Let me see, I actually wrote that out. I would like it to say for all meetings, you just said for special meetings. It should be for all meetings and I would like it to say including on the county calendar. There is the calendar that has each of the meetings that are coming up. That's what most people look to that are on the internet. Since you don't meet again for another ten years, there is certainly the direction it its going. Not everybody has a newspaper. I wrote the wording down here someplace. The other point would be, what a number of the boards are doing is, if you go to that calendar, the Hawaii County events calendar, it lists all the different boards. It doesn't list all; it doesn't include the Planning Commission, which I think is very wrong. Some of them, then you can click to where their agenda is. Again looking at it in terms of notice to people, so they can participate, it would be nice to say including putting it on that calendar, and if available linking it to the board's agenda for its upcoming meeting. A number of them do that, even like the Hilo Vision 2025, the County Council does it. If you don't do it, for example to get to the Planning Commission, to find out what the Planning Commission is doing - -maybe someone catches it in the newspaper, but to do it on the internet - -you have to go to the County page, find the listing for the Planning Department, and then in sort of an unsorted list, find where it mentions the Planning Commission actions and agenda, and then you click on that. It would be nice to sort of have a set standard. I think this is even more important right now, given what happened recently with the County Council reorganization. In that case - -which was obviously a very important issue to people - -on Wednesday night before a holiday, that agenda was stamped at 11:15 p.m. by Chairman Yoshimoto, and then they filed it in the Clerk's office, and then they posted it at the Ben Franklin Building, which was then locked until Friday. So that whereas it says six days public notice, the Clerk Goodenow put it on his own site, but he had never done that before, it was always on the Calendar and on the Council site. So, if you did have sort of a standard in terms of the internet, which is what people are using, however you do it, then everyone will get into that that is the routine way to find out what is going on. The public is supposed to have notice six days in advance. Another point that came up was the affirmative vote of the majority of the entire membership and what that meant. I thought that was sort of a good point, and the only thing I was looking for was if there was another way to add more clarity, and Ms. Jarman got into that. Where it says there has to be a majority vote for the council to take action, if you have a four /four vote to kill something, that's not an affirmative vote for that council action. I wondered, aren't votes all supposed to all be stated in the affirmative. If there could be a little more clarity there so it's not a - - -I'm just into preventing litigation, and prevent issues and get clarity wherever we can. Whatever you decide, it's just looking at it in terms of clarity and letting people know. 5