My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1989-01-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1989-01-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 9:56:09 AM
Creation date
4/9/2018 9:56:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1989
Meeting date
1/11/1989
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1989-01-11
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> PAMELA CUSHNIE: Do you have any premonitions of conflict of <br /> • interests? <br /> FRED GIANNINI: Well, unless, (pause) typically with this <br /> sort of a thing it would be, it's difficult to say, that <br /> there is conflict because normally boards where you have like <br /> the Planning Commission if a member of the Planning <br /> Commission has a financial interest something that's coming <br /> up for a permit or something like that-- that's a clear <br /> conflict of interest but here what you are talking about, <br /> what your job is is to recommend broad overall charter <br /> proposals so I would see not very much. I would really be <br /> difficult to speculate or hypothesize on possible conflicts <br /> of interest here. Again when you get into specific details <br /> you might be talking about-- when you come to an area about <br /> certain, you know, about revamping--in some way making <br /> changes in the structure of county government--if some of you <br /> have relatives in the county government or something like <br /> that that might be something you might like to have a legal <br /> counsel on so that I think would be directed toward the <br /> commission's attorney. Again, that is something that I <br /> wouldn't want to speculate or hypothesize on what might come <br /> up. The conflict of interest that I can see primarily here <br /> is a potential of, you know, that the corporation counsel <br /> office is a creature of the charter and for us to be advising <br /> on what changes should be made to the charter might not <br /> be--that would not be totally without an appearance of <br /> inpropriety. That's why I'm being, you know, more reticent <br /> on giving you an opinion on this. <br /> ROBERT BETHEA: Well there are things that don't pertain to <br /> that. For example the interpretation on the Sunshine Laws, <br /> and I'm simply asking whether or not we should rely on our <br /> counsel or are you available for answers to those questions? <br /> FRED GIANNINI: I would say our office would be available to <br /> you until you hire, until you retain, your counsel and then I <br /> would think once you retain counsel all things should be <br /> directed to him or her whoever the counsel is. <br /> PAMELA CUSHNIE: It sounds like the conflict would come in <br /> our depending on the current administration or advice and <br /> suggestions we should divorce ourselves from contact? <br /> FRED GIANNINI: Well I would think, yeah, that would probably <br /> be the correct thing to do. <br /> AILEEN LUM: Can I have a clarification on what you mean by <br /> divorcing from contact? <br /> PAMELA CUSHNIE: No alimony involved. (laughter) <br /> • 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.