My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1989-04-26
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1989-04-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2018 3:54:05 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 12:25:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1989
Meeting date
4/26/1989
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1989-04-26
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIZUNO: Uh-huh. Sure. . . <br /> L'ORANGE: So that ' s what I 'm talking about . When you <br /> say computers , I get worried. <br /> BETHEA: Yeah. Okay. Alright. I didn' t mean to be <br /> broad. That type of data processing information system so <br /> that you don' t get a lot of systems that don' t mesh one with <br /> the other. <br /> MIZUNO: I guess the bottom line is we need to control <br /> the direction that we ' re headed as far as the County' s <br /> concerned, then computerizing the different departments . We <br /> need control . And I think what we've established now <br /> works. I think that the data processing committee which was <br /> created by this administration to ( inaudible) I think is <br /> doing a very good job at controlling and setting direction. <br /> But my problem is that in a lot of cases , the damage has <br /> already been done. And to correct it will be almost <br /> impossible at this stage for it would be very expensive to <br /> do. What I wanna do. . .my statement really pertains to <br /> controling the future, I mean, and less on correcting some <br /> of these problems in the past . I think it would just be too <br /> expensive to correct all our problems . <br /> POPPE: Well , may I suggest that we can also impose on <br /> you to get us at least a conceptual thing, perhaps based on <br /> what you ' re doing now for consideration? <br /> MIZUNO: I ' ll put it in writing. <br /> JUVIK: Excuse me, just to follow up. Do you think <br /> maybe that . . . this is really an area the Charter has to get <br /> into? I mean, for example, I know in the area of computers , <br /> technology is changing so rapidly, and we only review the <br /> Charter every ten years. Maybe. . . I think these suggestions <br /> are obviously are good ones . I 'm just wondering whether <br /> maybe the Charter ' s getting too detailed for a direct . . .you <br /> know, internal committees within the administration or so on <br /> that may be necessary to solve some computer problems may <br /> develop one year and disappear later . You know, I 'm just <br /> pointing that out as sort of the devil ' s advocate. Maybe we <br /> don' t really need to get that detailed in the Charter. <br /> Whether a body, Council , or administrative activity they <br /> want to develop some response to computerization and so <br /> forth. Obviously, if you can save the taxpayer money, this <br /> is good and efficient . But I 'm not sure. . . I 'm just not sure <br /> that necessarily has to be spelled out in a great deal in <br /> the Charter . <br /> POPPE: I must admit prior to my comments , I was <br /> thinking the same thing. Do we really want to get into <br /> this? Is it possible that you even broaden it , and maybe <br /> 276 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.