Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> WEST HAWAII COMMITTEE <br /> COUNTY CHARTER REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> AUGUST 9, 1989 <br /> The West Hawaii Committee has functioned continuously since 1970. Their <br /> basic purpose is to help make West Hawaii a better place in which to live <br /> by active participation in civic affairs. Specific purposes include, but <br /> are not limited to the following: <br /> A. To initiate,develope, research, foster and and promote <br /> programs to meet various civic needs in the fields of <br /> planning, economic developement, health, recreation and <br /> education. <br /> B. To vigorously influence, in, a non-partisan fashion, the <br /> County ( and State, when required) executive and legislative <br /> • governmental branches to govern and legislate for West <br /> Hawaii as perfectly as can resonably be expected. <br /> C. To establish and maintain close relationships with <br /> government officials,_ _civic organizations and_service <br /> organizations to further the above. <br /> For those not familiar with West Hawaii Committee, a close analogy, to its' <br /> functionings might be the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco, the Foreign <br /> Affairs Council of New York City, or, closer to size, the round table in <br /> front of many coffee shops in small Mid-Western towns. <br /> Our membership comes from diverse backgrounds but have one trait in common: <br /> they are or have been successful in their chosen fields. They have learned <br /> to examine problems from several different perpectives and arrive at a <br /> mutually agreeable position. That is the process followed in preparing the <br /> testimony we are pleased to present to you today. <br /> In preparing our testimony to this commission, we wish to call attention to <br /> thoserights apparently spelled out in the United States Supreme Court <br /> interpretations of the U.S. Constitution commonly referred to as " one man - <br /> one vote"representation and further refined by the State of Hawaii in <br /> Travis-vs-King, 1982 . <br /> 493 <br />