Laserfiche WebLink
Our recommendations are: <br /> ARTICLE 3 Section 3-2 now reads in part: "There shall be a County Council <br /> composed of nine members who shall be elected at-large for <br /> terms of four years. " "Of the nine members elected to the <br /> County Council, one shall be a resident of the district of <br /> Puna, one a resident of the district of Kau, one a resident <br /> of the combined districts of North and South Kona, one a <br /> resident of the combined districts of North and South Kohala, <br /> one resident of Hamakua and one a resident of the combined <br /> districts of North and South Hilo. " <br /> The following are 1987 population estimates per traditional <br /> Districts from the 1988 Hawaii State Data Book as represented <br /> in Section 3-2 above: <br /> DISTRICT EST.POP. OVER UNDER <br /> REPRESENTED REPRESENTED <br /> Kau 4700 8011 <br /> N. Kohala 3600 <br /> S. Kohala 7100 911 <br /> N. Kona 20500 <br /> S. Kona 7300 15089 <br /> Hamakua 5300 7411 <br /> North Hilo 1500 <br /> South Hilo 45300/ 34089 <br /> Puna 19000 6289 <br /> TOTALS 114400 divided by 9 = 12711 <br /> Taking into consideration that populations ebb, flow and shift constantly i <br /> and reminding the Commission of testimony they heard from Professor Jon Van <br /> Dyke, University of Hawaii Professor of Constitutional Law on February 15, <br /> 1989, in part and referring to At-Large elected members "What we call this <br /> is a multi-member system in the sense that all nine are elected by the At- <br /> Large system. That can be constitutional. It is used in a number of <br /> situations. But it does have the potentiality of being unconstitutional. "- <br /> "If the result of an at-large or muti-member approach is to exclude certain <br /> distinct racial groups or other identifiable political groupings, the U.S. <br /> Supreme Court has had a lot of litigation, particularly in the South where <br /> black people view at-large election processes as discriminating against <br /> Othem. " <br /> "And the other way it can be distorting is that the person elected from a <br /> district may not be , in fact, the choice of the people in that district" <br /> - I <br /> Discussing single district representation "the advantage is that those <br /> 494 <br />