My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1990-07-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1990-07-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 8:58:49 AM
Creation date
4/10/2018 8:58:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1990
Meeting date
7/11/1990
Type
MIN
Comments
To keep in order by page number; Exhibits are scanned before Minutes of meeting.
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1990-07-11
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter §14-2 (c) is confusing, and the language proposed by <br /> 111 Corporation Counsel would be an improvement. The thrust of the <br /> present §14-2 (c) is that an officer or employee who has personal <br /> interests that may be incompatible with his or her official <br /> duties should divest himself or herself of those interests. This <br /> may not be practical. The personal interests may not create a <br /> conflict unless some special circumstance arises: for example, <br /> you sit on the Planning Commission and your neighbor puts in an <br /> application to operate a rock-crusher. The revision proposed by <br /> Corporation Counsel makes it clear that when there is a <br /> significant conflict, the individual should not take "official <br /> action" : for example, should refrain from voting. <br /> Agenda Item 9: The Commission has been asked to review the <br /> Charter provisions concerning the disability of the mayor: §13- <br /> 1 (f) (8) ; §5-1.5, and §5-1. 6 . <br /> Agenda Item 10: It was proposed that if the single-member <br /> district council is adopted, that all boards and commissions <br /> which presently have nine members be changed so that one member <br /> must reside in each district. This would affect the Planning <br /> Commission and the Board of Water Supply. If the Charter <br /> Commission adopts this change, we must establish a procedure for <br /> phasing in the change because the present Board members may not <br /> live in the right areas. The procedure could be that as <br /> vacancies occur, the mayor would be required to fill the vacancy <br /> from any district which is not represented. <br /> • Agenda Item 11: Tax Board of Review. There is at present, <br /> a Tax Board of Review which is established by ordinance. I have <br /> attached a copy of the ordinance. It could be placed in the <br /> Charter; I do not see any difference if it continued to exist <br /> only by virtue of an ordinance. <br /> Agenda Item 12 : County employees' eligibility for elective <br /> office. The Board of Ethics asked for clarification on this <br /> issue. There is, at present, no legal prohibition against county <br /> employees running for county elective office. As a practical <br /> matter, I do not see how someone could be a county employee and <br /> hold a county elective office at the same time. <br /> Agenda Item 13 : The Commission needs to clarify whether <br /> deputy directors will be required for all Charter departments, or <br /> just for managing director and finance. <br /> Agenda Item 14: Salary Commission. This is a technical <br /> matter: in addition to the change we have adopted, the reference <br /> to the salary of the mayor being established by ordinance (§5- <br /> 1. 3) and the salary of the prosecuting attorney by law (§9-3) <br /> should be deleted. <br /> 111 <br /> -2- <br /> 916 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.