MIN CHC 1990-07-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• me that there would be less voter confusion if the proposed amendments were published together. The council could prepare a • digest of its amendment, which could be incorporated into the newspaper publication and the pamphlet. Because the complete text of the council's proposed amendments must be published, it might be a good idea to also publish the complete text of the Commission's amendments. I have had preliminary discussions with • the county clerk about coordinating the publication and publicity, and I am fairly confident- that we will be able to' work together effectively to avoid voter confusion as much as possible. The Commission had also`- discussed the possibility of a mailing to voters. The pamphlet could be the basis for such a mailing. I have been told that the cost of a mailing to all voters would be about $6, 000 • for mailing alone. The Commission must decide how the various proposals will be presented to the voters. It is legally permitted to lump together a number of different subjects into a single proposed amendment. In Kahalekai v. Doi, 60 Haw. 324, 337 (1978) the Hawaii Supreme court considered a challenge to certain constitutional amendments based on, among other factors, the fact that one of the ballot questions contained two separate subjects. The court held that a single constitutional amendment could cover more than one subject or purpose, as long as there was no express requirement in the law that it encompass only one subject. The same should be true for charter amendments; there is no express requirement in the charter that the individual amendments consist of a single subject each. You will note. that in the "ballot" I prepared, there are a number of different subjects which are joined in a single amendment (Proposals 8 and 9) . The alternative is either to have very many ballot questions (possibly in excess of twenty-five) or to choose not besubmitto the voters many of the changes which the Commission haspreviously voted to recommend. If we do have ballot questions which encompass a number of subjects, we must decide how much information to give on the ballot itself. The. draft ballot I prepared attempts to give a brief description of each change. This results in a fairly lengthy ballot. The alternative is to. simply say something like "Should Proposal 8 be adopted? Please refer- to the -Ballot Pamphlet for a summary of -Proposal 8 . " • The division of subjects into various proposals which. is contained in the attachments, to this letter is only one of the possible ways of grouping them together. Based on the previous discussions we have had, I believe there is a consensus among the commissioners that the amendments which might be more controversial, or which propose more extensive- changes to the • -2- 12a.