My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1989-09-16 PH
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearing
>
MIN CHC 1989-09-16 PH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 2:55:20 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 2:54:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1989
Meeting date
9/16/1989
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
an additional loss of five months income as well. A single <br /> member distric system would actually allow for a larger pool <br /> campaign <br /> of qualified candidates because theAexpense would be less , al- <br /> lowing more potential candidates to "race" . It would also al- <br /> low the candidate to really get to know the constituents in <br /> their distric, and allow the constituents to become much bet- <br /> ter acquainted with the candidates , their abilities , and what <br /> they truely represent. <br /> In our present system, we currently allow Hilo to vote in our <br /> council person because of their large population. Let' s face <br /> it, if a Kona candidate is not well known in Hilo, they have <br /> very little chance of winning the election. We also know of <br /> examples where candidates may loose in their own distric, yet <br /> still be elected by other districs . If a candidate who has <br /> residencey in one distric, can' t even win in that dis- <br /> tric, there' s probably a very good reason why his distric does <br /> not want he or she representing them. Additionally, many areas <br /> such as Hamakua, Kau and certain parts of Hilo and Kohala are <br /> still in this day and age, Union controlled. They vote the <br /> way the Union tells them to vote. . .for whichever candidate the <br /> Union has endorsed. Unfortunately, this does not neccessarily <br /> mean the Union Boss has given the candidate much thought or <br /> that they or endorsing the candidate which might be the best <br /> for a distric. . .no, they are endorsing the candidate that will <br /> vote the way the Union dictates when he or she is sitting on <br /> that council . Although the Unions have been responsible for <br /> some very important social and economic changes in this State, <br /> we don' t neccessarily want to have a situtation where a Union <br /> endorsed candidate can 'win Island-wide, yet cannot even win in <br /> his or her own distric. Single member districs will allow us <br /> to have distric represntation that is truely cognizant of the <br /> problems and pitfalls a distric faces and the views of how it ' s <br /> 610 constituents want these matter address . Single member districs <br /> offer true distric representation for the over-all good of the <br /> entire Island. <br /> -P. 2 . - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.