My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1989-09-16 PH
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearing
>
MIN CHC 1989-09-16 PH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 2:55:20 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 2:54:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1989
Meeting date
9/16/1989
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The system I advocate is for the six distric seats , Kona, Kau, <br /> Kohala, Hilo, Puna, and Hamakua to be elected by their respec- <br /> tive districs . The 3 remaining council seats would run-at- <br /> large. Each distric council member would truely represent <br /> an equal number of residents and it would truly be "one <br /> man, one vote" , with each distric council member accountable <br /> and directly responsible to their resident distric and their <br /> constituents . The 3 at-large council persons would oversee & <br /> shoulder responsiblity and accountability county-wide. <br /> I urge you to study this issue carefully, including educating <br /> the public about single member districs and careful wording <br /> with actual examples , should it be placed on the ballot. <br /> With regards to initiative powers , I am requesting that this <br /> be left in the charter and that initiative powers be allowed <br /> for all matters . As you may know, the State Supreme Court <br /> pointed out the conflicts between vague language with re- <br /> gards to iniative(in the Sandy Beach situation) , verses explicit <br /> language allowing the county council the power to zone. This <br /> conflict and prevailing language for this statue will be ad- <br /> dressed and decided in next years legislature; since the Charter <br /> Review Commission meets only once every 10 years , it is impera- <br /> tive that initiative powers be left in our Charter. <br /> To have a successful iniative requires that 15% of our popu- <br /> lation that voted in the last mayoral election, sign a peti- <br /> tion to place that item on the ballot. This is a very difficult <br /> proceedure, and anytime you acquire that percentage of valid <br /> voter6 signatures , there is a very good reason for that iniative <br /> to be on that ballot. It does not neccessarily mean that the <br /> iniative will pass . . . .but it points out that a certain amount of <br /> voters are concerned, for whatever reason. And it allows the <br /> people their RIGHT to vote , with the majority ruling; our government <br /> 611 <br /> is based on this- concept!' It"s an excellent checks and balance system <br /> for our elected officials ; it allows the people to right to recti- <br /> fy poor decisions or laws . And after all, our government, elected <br /> officials and even our charter is suppossed to represent the true <br /> will of the people. <br /> -P.3 . - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.