My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COMM. 025
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Agendas
>
Communications (agenda items)
>
COMM. 025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:51 AM
Creation date
7/13/2018 2:32:10 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-02-20
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
AGE CHC 1979-02-27
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission -2- February 9, 1979 <br /> In this regard, we have changed the duties and responsibilities <br /> of some positions and are now in the process of filling the EDP <br /> positions and will be using the Water Department' s computer to <br /> . process payrolls, personnel and accounting transactions. <br /> Eventually, we hope to acquire the use of a more versatile and <br /> powerful computer. <br /> • <br /> There is sufficient flexibility under present laws to make <br /> organizational shifts with changing time so that the basic <br /> organizational structure can remain. The changes and additions <br /> I would recommend are minor procedural ones. These are: <br /> • <br /> 1. Redefining lapsing of appropriation for capital expen- <br /> diture. The proposed amendment (attached) would lapse any <br /> unencumbered appropriation at the end of two fiscal years <br /> following the fiscal year of the appropriation. Now an appro- <br /> priation can remain on the books indefinitely as long as some <br /> expenditure of the appropriation was made. <br /> 2. Shifting the burden of verifying (instead of certifying) <br /> the availability of funds for small purchases and obligations <br /> from the director of finance to the respective agency head who <br /> should be controlling expenditures from his own appropriations. <br /> 3. Adding a centralized purchasing section similar to that <br /> of the City and County of Honolulu. It assigns the procurement <br /> responsibility to the director of finance, 'but is not intended <br /> to take over procurement of contractual services for construction <br /> related expenditures . Certain exceptions to advertised bids <br /> are also included. These are situations when there is no time <br /> to bid-advertise, e.g. , hiring a bulldozer to dig out a fire at <br /> the landfill; allowing open-market ,purchases of sums under $500; <br /> allowingpurchase of special items such as zoo animals and feed, <br /> books and plants; and where the public interest would be served <br /> by standardizing technical equipment. <br /> I should also like to comment on a few other sections . <br /> 1. There appears to be a conflict between the second sen- <br /> tence in Sec. 3-12 (Emergency Ordinance) and Sec. 10-8 (Appropria- <br /> tions: Supplemental and Emergency) . Sec. 3-12 prohibits use <br /> of emergency ordinances to borrow money; yet Sec. 10-8 allows <br /> issuance of emergency notes by ordinance. Perhaps legal counsel <br /> can clarify this matter to remove the question of authority in <br /> the event that such use may be required in the future. <br /> 2. Sec. 3-13 (Submission of Bills to Mayor) . The operating <br /> and capital budgets are effective July 1; yet a veto by the Mayor <br /> may not be overriden by the council until the latter part of July. <br /> Some language change or legal opinion is needed to clarify this <br /> section as to the effective date of the budget ordinance and <br /> which budget applies during the. veto reconsideration period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.