Laserfiche WebLink
' . <br /> . ' ` ® • .S ... <br /> set-up your government so that thin political activity can <br /> exf.*.rcise in the easiest way. • I think you should decide on <br /> the basis of largely, what' s the easiest way, the way most <br /> likely the people can get the kind of services they want and once ' <br /> they decide. what they want, that that be the kind of government <br /> that you' re going to recommend. <br /> County overnment as opposcd to city " <br /> tgovernment® Last week <br /> your cussion was on esscntiaiiy a city norm of government, <br /> yet this is a countye ' What' s the connection between the two? • <br /> The difference is that the county here is quite different <br /> • from the ' traditional county on the mainland inasmuch as it <br /> does furnish all local services furnished by cities as compared <br /> to traditional county carrying out certain assignments given <br /> to it by the state . County government as such is often <br /> attacked as being obsolete, an anachronism, and the way it' s <br /> run in most states , it is . However, this isn' t necessarily <br /> true at all and those counties that have, usually by statutes <br /> remodeled their governments to bring some order out of chaos . <br /> Power and separation of power. I would -like to suggest that <br /> separation of i- ar.: isa historical accident. The separation <br /> of power is not a law of nature--it is _just something that <br /> worked out extremely well in the American federal government <br /> and it worked reasonably well in most state governments . This <br /> • . doesn' t necessarily mean that it has to be imposed all the way eo <br /> • down the linea When you get a mayor council• government, then . <br /> you get the question--the committee says how much separation <br /> of powers do you want? Right now there is very little, This <br /> is characterized by the weak-mayor form of government. Also , <br /> there is not •much separation of powers so people will say , "tJe <br /> ought to separate executive from the legislative. This does <br /> have the effect of strengthening position of the mayor. There <br /> are a few criteria you ought to use if you want to move in <br /> this direction: <br /> 1. The mayor ought to be elected m <br /> 2. Whether he has a vote in the council . . "rlere he does . This <br /> is typical of weak-mayor form of government. If you want <br /> -ate him from the council. then take away hi., vote <br /> to separate P � <br /> in the council.e • <br /> 3 o Has he a veto? you're strengthening the position of the <br /> mayor so certr,ii.l.:r you don' t haw:. -, L,at;,.tien of: .power by <br /> . giving h.:;m moye pm7er by veto. He' s got one vote that <br /> counts as mu,Th as the whole council put together, which <br /> is not separating power <br /> 4, Confirmation of appointment. As soon as council starts <br /> e ' 7 <br /> confirming an;,ointmentn� v they're acting as an executive; <br /> • so if you want to separate this and to strengthen the <br /> mayor you don' t want to have confirmation of appointments <br /> by the council . <br /> 50 Existence of other elected officers , independent boards <br /> • and other officers appointed by the council . This usually <br /> . distinguishes the various degrees in strengthening <br /> executive in state levels . You dont have such a thing <br /> as strong or weak mayor form but: you have various degrees <br /> • of a mayor-council form. . <br /> bo The other main thing that distinguishes 'his strength, is the <br /> authority to prepare the budget. Host of these things <br /> • eventually run down to matters• of - dollars and cents . If <br /> the mayor cannot prepare executive budget, cannot <br />