Laserfiche WebLink
MR. KUNIYOSHI: Yes, I have no quarrel with that. <br /> As far as the appointment of commissions, I have no say. It' s <br /> up to the executive branch, the administration, and for the Council <br /> to appoint and the confirmation thereof. As far as the Liquor <br /> Commission body, seven, well, primarily they represent the major <br /> districts. I think it' s a good idea for the commission to be <br /> represented by major districts -- Kona, Kohala, Ka'u. And, as <br /> I say, the number differs. On the commission you have seven members. <br /> On the adjudicatory board you have five members. As a judicial <br /> body, I think the number five is a good number. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI: Mr. Kuniyoshi, you said thought° <br /> you are grandfathered in so that after your tenure, the Liquor <br /> Commission will appoint a director. <br /> MR. KUNIYOSHI: Correct. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI: Not the Mayor then? Is this true <br /> on the other islands? <br /> MR. KUNIYOSHI: No. You see on the other islands, <br /> for example, the executive heads of the Honolulu Liquor Commission <br /> and the Kauai Liquor Commission, my counterparts, are under civil <br /> service. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI: Honolulu and---? <br /> MR. KUNIYOSHI: And Kauai, they are civil service. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI: Just like you. <br /> MR. KUNIYOSHI: Yes, except I'm grandfathered. In <br /> the case of Maui, I' ll give you a good example. The person who <br /> retired was under a similar situation. Even the Maui County <br /> grandfathered because the prior head was a civil service employee, <br /> just like I am. Recently that person retired. So the present <br /> director of the Department of Liquor Control on Maui is still an <br /> appointed person, did not come through the civilservice rules <br /> and regulations. So the present head of the Maui Liquor Control <br /> is not civil service employee. In other words, he can be removed <br /> by the Liquor Commission. Well, for good cause. The only problem <br /> with this, now that you've mentioned it, in a sense it doesn' t <br /> make sense because the commission appoints the director and on <br /> the day-to-day operatibns this person is under the control of the <br /> Mayor. There may be conflict. It appears that once in awhile <br /> I am accountable to three bodies. One, to the commission to pro- <br /> vide the services , the other is to the Liquor Control Board. In <br /> fact, four. The other is to the Mayor under my general supervision, <br /> and I'm accountable also to my staff. So at times when the four <br /> different bodieshave conflicting ideas of what should be done, <br /> then I'm faced with the problem of trying to make a decision based <br /> upon input from four different bodies. And this sometimes entails <br /> a lot of problems. <br /> My concern is this idea of the commission appointing. After that, <br /> the commission has no say because after all, 99 percent of the <br /> time, I 'm under the general supervision of the Mayor. So assuming <br /> - 5 - <br />