Laserfiche WebLink
resident requirements running at large, I think there is a <br /> need to bring it back again a littlelbit closer to the people <br /> and so that the reaction can take place. So, I would like to <br /> propose that the council makeup be made up similar to that of <br /> the House of Representatives. In other words, there would be <br /> five districts as there are now. And perhaps you could write <br /> in that say, there is a Constitutional Convention change or a <br /> State Legislative change, that atthat time we should also <br /> review our County Council makeup also. I think that by <br /> districting according the the way the State House is <br /> apportioned is a good one. That would give five members. <br /> Now we know that presently the council is made up of nine <br /> members. I think that the remaining amount either two or <br /> four, right, five plus two coming seven or four, coming back <br /> up to nine should be at large representation. In other words , <br /> I 'm not that strong as whether it should be seven or nine. <br /> I don ' t know that the magic number is in terms of represen- <br /> tation numbers for the island. I do think it is necessary <br /> ( 1) to get districts and ( 2) to get apportioned at large <br /> members. So, I think there should be at least two or four, <br /> whichever way you decide, at large members and the remaining <br /> five being districts. This, as I stated to you, is a change <br /> from my original position where I said that four should be at <br /> large. This is going to be a topic alone. Maybe we can just <br /> leave it open and if anyone wants to ask me a few questions <br /> they may. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: What are you thinking by way of terms? <br /> MAYOR MATAYOSHI : The term, I think, should 'f'remain four. I feel <br /> very strongly about this . I think that the term should remain <br /> four. This, I think, is consistent and I would not change my <br /> position from 1963. The reason is that when the people come <br /> on board, as in the old Board of Supervisors on which I had <br /> the opportunity to serve it was 'two years and there is a tendency <br /> to become very shortsighted and 'things must be done quickly <br /> because there are elections coming up, there is pressure over <br /> politics and there is no real longer term planning process. <br /> I think there is need. I definitely feel there is need for four <br /> years. Both on the council and the administrative side. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: Do you have any feelings concerning staggered terms <br /> as far as say half of the council members would be elected every <br /> two years? <br /> MAYOR MATAYOSHI : Yes , I do. I do not feel it should be staggered. <br /> I think it should be all at one tithe. The body, if it were large, <br /> say twenty-five, thirty, fifty. A large number of people, I can <br /> appreciate the fact that there should be some staggerization <br /> about with that great numbers of people, but when you get a <br /> small group running about seven or nine, I think you 're going <br /> to find yourself if you split up four running and five set. <br /> Suppose you have nine people, four coming up this year and five <br /> -8- <br />