My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-02-27
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:14:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
2/27/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-02-27
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The other thing that I would like to perhaps <br /> caution you about because I fell victim to it. I think ;the <br /> whole Charter Commission that finally worked on this onefell <br /> victim. We were so convinced that we had the perfect document, <br /> that we had the answers to all of the county' s problems,;; that <br /> we really went all out for this. We had an advertising ;; <br /> budget which was permitted. We went out and we campaigned for <br /> it:, We advertising for it and we really pushed it. We ''were, <br /> in effect, campaigning for the charter and we got it passed.' <br /> Now I think some of us may look back from time to time and say <br /> did we really do the right thing. You are going to have the <br /> same problem. You are going to come up with some changes and. <br /> .you are going to feel very strongly about those changes and <br /> this is good. This is what makes) us all tick. You areygoing <br /> to work like the devil on getting those things through. <br /> Internally, within the commission , you are going to work for <br /> View your point of because you think it is right. And once <br /> the thing is adopted by conseni5us then you are going to ,work <br /> for the consensus point of view. And it is important that <br /> you do. But at the same time maybe you shouldn ' t feel 1ioo <br /> bad if on Some of it the public says no. Because, basically, <br /> I get back to what I said in the first place, the form is not <br /> as important as the substance and the good will of the people <br /> that are going to make it work. !' <br /> And with that I would like to thank you for <br /> inviting me. I will be happy to answer any other questions <br /> but those are just my own personal feelings.. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: On this Initiative and Referendum <br /> I notice that recall is left out. What is the rationale of <br /> that? <br /> MR. KOEHNEN: We thought that recall really • <br /> should be for malfeasance not merely because you are an ; un- <br /> popular guy. Sometimes you have to do some very unpopular <br /> things. Sometimes I wish that some' elected officials would do <br /> more unpopular things because I think they really are the <br /> right things-=to_=do® And yet you can get recalled if you do <br /> something like--That. ' I 'm not saying that Bilandic is a' good <br /> mayor or anything else, but you know you have a perfect example - <br /> there of he does something the people don 't like so youthrow <br /> out a recall petition against him. <br /> The charter does provide that anybody can be <br /> removed for malfeasance. They can be removed for malfeasance <br /> or misfeasance or what have you. So that we felt was basically <br /> the only reason he should be removed. That is why no recall. <br /> • Well , again , I 'd like to thank you very much. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Thank you, very much, <br /> Mr. Koehnen. <br /> RECESS: At 4:50 p.m. the Chair called for a short - <br /> recess. <br /> -22- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.