My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-03-13
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-03-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:20:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
3/13/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-03-13
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the population balance i)s going to shift in this county over <br /> the next 10 years before the next charter revision and there <br /> should be some provision for automatic redisdt-ricting. The <br /> only suggestion that:. I can ma=ltie : to you, at themoment, is to <br /> take a look at the State Constitution which I believe already <br /> has provision for redistricting the House of Representatives <br /> and the State Senate. We could base the county, somewhat, on <br /> the list there. <br /> Well , gentlemen , that is all I have to say. <br /> We' ll be. glad to try to answer any questions you have. Again, <br /> I 'd like to say we greatly apprectate the opportunity of <br /> coming over here and talking to you face to face because in <br /> writing letters you don ' t really have the feedback as to how <br /> your ideas are being received and I 'm very glad we came over <br /> today. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Moss , you recommended doing <br /> away with some commissions. I didn ' t quite get all of that. <br /> Which commissions did you recommend doing away with?" <br /> MR. MOSS: Frank. . .? <br /> MR. ZUZAX:J We had suggested the consideration <br /> of consolidating a number of the commissions and the salary <br /> commission which is on page 3 of. the County Charter; the civil <br /> service commission which is on page 16 ; the police commission <br /> and the reason that we eliminated the police commission if <br /> you notice on the organizational chart, the pped.iee has been in- <br /> corporated in the department of public service; the liquor which <br /> is on page 17 of the County Charter and again looking at your <br /> chart under the department of public affairs , you' ll notice <br /> personnel. .the second one is liquor, so that is where your <br /> liquor control would be. Your water commission is under the <br /> department of public works , water, parks and recreation . Now <br /> the personnel commission would embody or include the salary, <br /> the civil serviceand pension which is not within the charter <br /> but is one of the commissions that we currently have. By putting <br /> them altogether under one personnel commission it consolidates <br /> that. So we are eliminatWng a number of them. <br /> MR. MOSS: Frank , isn ' t it right that what . <br /> we are really saying is that there should be only three comm- <br /> issions left. The board of ethics ; the combined civil service, <br /> salary and pension board and the planning commission.. <br /> MR. ZUZJ : 3) Right. Those are the only ones <br /> that we suggest you consider retaining. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: On. this topic is of commissions. <br /> ..r� p <br /> Mr. Zuza 71 what is the rationale for doing away with the police <br /> commission? As I see it, bane of the committee ' s recommendations <br /> is that you would like to somewhat curtail the Mayor' s powers. <br /> Don ' t you think that by e 1 minating the police commission , you <br /> are, in fact, increasing the Mayor ' s powers? <br /> - 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.