My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-04-10
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-04-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:27:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
4/10/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-04-10
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
who were elected to run at-large for four years in numbered <br /> positions. They were all elected by majority vote. There <br /> was no requirement that any person reside in a specific <br /> district. There were no blacks who were elected to one of <br /> the three commissioner positions. Of the population of <br /> 190, 000 in Mobile, Alabama back in 1970, 35% of the people <br /> in Mobile were black . Because of that, the court of appeals <br /> held that the at-large voting plan was unconstitutional. <br /> Because of the reasons that I previously explained. The <br /> blacks were not given access to the political process and <br /> the at-large plan because the whites held a majority they <br /> could always elect whites. . `The court ordered nine single <br /> member districts instead of three at-large seats. Under this <br /> scheme, it almost guarantees that at least a number of negroes <br /> would be elected based on ,their percentage of the population. <br /> Basically, so far, that is what I found to <br /> give you some guidelines on how to apply the provisions in <br /> the County Charter. Do you have any questions) can answer? <br /> I don ' t know whether I can answer them. Under our provision <br /> of the charter, we have six members elected at-large of the <br /> nine. Wait a minute, nine members who shall be elected at- <br /> large with terms of four years. Of the nine, six are <br /> required to reside in specific districts, right? Otherwise <br /> known as 'a _ <br /> plan. More questions? <br /> One parting shot, so to speak. As I say, <br /> we have to exercise some caution in using the racial cases, <br /> reapportionment cases, to apply here. The reasons may not <br /> be applicable. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI : Ms. Isbell , last week , <br /> talked about a reapportionment commission that. the Honolulu <br /> Charter .wanted. Is there also an apportionment commission <br /> for the state house? <br /> MR. ODA: Under the State Constitution there <br /> is a reapportionment commission for state offices. I don ' t <br /> have the specific statute, here. They have a new one now <br /> under their present,__ recent amendment to the State Constitu- <br /> tion. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI : The proposals have been <br /> according to the state house districts and that would be <br /> a change in the district representation. I suppose that we <br /> could put something in the charter that says there shall be <br /> a reapportionment commission also? <br /> MR. ODA: That can be done. There is a <br /> county that has a reapportionment commission. It is Honolulu. <br /> The other counties do not, at the present time. As Mr. Ishida <br /> and I were discussing this , maybe the concept of reapportion- <br /> ment should be left to a -separate- -body like a reapportionment <br /> commission to give it appropriate deliberation. This Charter <br /> Commission has so many things that it must do that reapporti'on- <br /> men'c, or redistricting , ' whatever can be left as a specialty <br /> for one group to look at in depth. <br /> - 31 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.