Laserfiche WebLink
MR. ISHIDA: You get the results but those votes <br /> that they cast become ineffective because the present system <br /> prevails. <br /> MR. ODA: But under that example, the yeses have <br /> already prevailed. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: No, we 're taking up the other <br /> situation. The no prevails. <br /> MR. SENSANO: Mr. Chairman. May I put down what <br /> I think. . . (chalkboard) <br /> MR. ODA: Richard, Mr. Sensano is asking what <br /> happens. (when the vote to retain present system prevails <br /> and all votes are also cast for an option. ) <br /> MR. ISHIDA: When that happens you just don ' t <br /> count the the second ballot. The present system has not been <br /> defeated. <br /> MR. SENSANO: Well, it ' s the same thing the other <br /> way. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: No. <br /> MR. CADINHA: What are we voting no and yes for? <br /> What is the question? <br /> MR. TRULSON: We 're talking about the intent. Now, <br /> Richard, was that your feeling about the intent? The way it <br /> was on the board? Is that what you 're saying now? <br /> MR. ISHIDA: No, no, I 'm just expressing what I 'm <br /> thinking of. <br /> MR. TRULSON: Oh, I thought we were going on record <br /> as to what our intention was. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: No. You said what your intent was, <br /> so I just put what my intent was. <br /> MR. TRULSON: Oh, no, I thought. . . <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Mr. Chairman. At the last meeting <br /> the intent was very simple because we had only three choices <br /> so the plurality of the three would carry and that would be <br /> obviously more than either one of those two. So now we have <br /> a fourth and that was making it harder. My intent was that <br /> we have three and the highest votes wins. But now you get <br /> four and it throws a different. . . <br /> CHAIRMAN SCHUTTE : Stuart, do you wish to look this <br /> over and. . .we've already deferred this until next week and <br /> hope that you can come up with something. <br /> _38- <br />