Laserfiche WebLink
MR. SCHUTTE: And as a result, another motion <br /> could follow this? Another proposal? <br /> MR. ODA: Not to amend. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: No. What could the motion be <br /> then? <br /> MR. ODA: As previously stated, Mr. Schutte, <br /> the motion to reconsider has to take place during the same <br /> session or the next session, at the latest, otherwise it ' s <br /> not timely. I assume that Mr. Trulson 's motion is, in effect, <br /> to suspend the rules to reconsider. <br /> MR. TRULSON: That 's not my intent. <br /> MR. ODA: I don 't know. <br /> MR. TRULSON: I cannot move to reconsider. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Well, to find out what Mr. Trulson <br /> has in mind, I ' ll second his motion. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Bud, your motion; if I understand <br /> it, is to suspend the Rules of Procedure with regard to the <br /> draft of the amendments? <br /> MR. TRULSON: With regards to Section 3-2 only. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Only 3-2? <br /> MR. TRULSON: Yes. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Point of order. <br /> MR. TRULSON: He already ruled on that. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Chairman. I think the whole <br /> intent of Mr. Trulson ' s motion, at this time, is to get the <br /> proposal of a 5-2-2 on the floor. If the proponents of the <br /> 5-2 are so inclined to allow it to come to the floor we could <br /> finish this once and for all. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: If this motion is proper and <br /> it is in order, we will have to bring it up. It's in order, <br /> right? <br /> MR. ODA: The motion to suspend the rules? <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Of procedure and to reconsider <br /> just Section 3-2, Mr. Trulson? <br /> MR. TRULSON: Yes. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Just Section 3-2? It ' s in <br /> order? <br /> -11- <br />